Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University -
Dan Illouz, Im Tirtzu Leader, Answers Rivka Carmi
LAST WEEK, the story developed further.
According to Im Tirtzu's research, Ben-Gurion University's Political
Science Department is not only homogeneously anti-Zionist, it is
also the source of the silencing of Zionist students. As such, Im
Tirtzu found it fair to inform donors to the university.
Donors to Israeli universities often find their
donation to be an act of Zionism. Helping academic institutions in
Israel helps Zionism. Im Tirtzu believed many of those donors would
be shocked and dismayed at the findings published in the report.
They would feel their donations have become counterproductive. It is
the right of those donors to be informed of the situation in the
university; a donor is allowed to know where his money goes.
Therefore, Im Tirtzu was ready to inform those donors of its
findings.
However, in a gesture of goodwill toward
Ben-Gurion University, Im Tirtzu sent it a letter giving it a 30-day
warning while asking it to use this time to change its policies and
remove the need for contacting donors.
The university used this gesture of goodwill
against Im Tirtzu, accusing it of threatening it with an ultimatum.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?id=185731
McCarthyism and post-Zionism
All Im Tirtzu asked from BGU is that a solution be found to the
extreme bias found in the Political Science department, where only
post-Zionist opinions are presented.
By DAN ILLOUZ
23/08/2010
Academic freedom is an essential component of
the mission of the academy. Scholars should be able to hold
political positions without fearing repression. This is precisely
the principle that guided Im Tirtzu's recent efforts to fight the
silencing of
Zionist opinions in Israeli academia. Unfortunately, these
efforts were met with misinformation, McCarthyism and outright lies.
As is often the case when Zionism is attacked, the victims have been
portrayed as aggressors while the aggressors were portrayed as
victims.
Several months ago, at the request of the
Knesset Education Committee, Im Tirtzu published a report revealing
frightening information about academia. The report recorded
testimonies from students who complained about a strong anti-Zionist
bias in universities. Those students also testified about instances
in which professors used intimidation and threats to silence Zionist
views. Im Tirtzu demanded action be taken to defend the freedom of
speech of Zionist students.
As Im Tirtzu demanded the right to free speech
for all, the post-Zionist sectors of the academic world accused it
of denying their free speech. However, freedom of speech does not
include freedom to silence other opinions. In an effort to silence
Im Tirtzu, its opponents accused it of McCarthyism and thought
policing.
In reality, the whole purpose of Im Tirtzu's
efforts was to remove thought policing from
Israel's academic world.
Im Tirtzu is not the only organization to have
dealt with this issue. Over the past few years, Israel Academia
Monitor has monitored the anti-Zionist behavior of Israeli academia,
building a database of testimonies on-line. NGO Monitor researched
the dependency of academics on foreign donors who often hold
anti-Israel views.
Most recently, the Institute for Zionist
Strategies published a report on post-Zionism in academia that
confirmed Im Tirtzu's findings.
The reaction to all of those reports was
identical. Academia didn't deny the findings. Rather, it focused on
accusing these groups of intimidating professors who hold different
views.
Of course, the only intimidation practiced was
the publication of well researched facts that post-Zionist academics
did not want published. If those facts were questionable, those who
disagree with them could openly rebut them.
Instead, they tried to intimidate the authors
of those reports by claiming that their factual reports were a form
of intimidation.
LAST WEEK, the story developed further.
According to Im Tirtzu's research, Ben-Gurion University's Political
Science Department is not only homogeneously anti-Zionist, it is
also the source of the silencing of Zionist students. As such, Im
Tirtzu found it fair to inform donors to the university.
Donors to Israeli universities often find their
donation to be an act of Zionism. Helping academic institutions in
Israel helps Zionism. Im Tirtzu believed many of those donors would
be shocked and dismayed at the findings published in the report.
They would feel their donations have become counterproductive. It is
the right of those donors to be informed of the situation in the
university; a donor is allowed to know where his money goes.
Therefore, Im Tirtzu was ready to inform those donors of its
findings.
However, in a gesture of goodwill toward
Ben-Gurion University, Im Tirtzu sent it a letter giving it a 30-day
warning while asking it to use this time to change its policies and
remove the need for contacting donors.
The university used this gesture of goodwill
against Im Tirtzu, accusing it of threatening it with an ultimatum.
The university, using the media as its proxy,
accused Im Tirtzu of threatening it to ensure all donations were
stopped unless it "fired leftist professors."
A quick look at the actual letter showed no
such threat.
First, Im Tirtzu does not have any unnatural
power over donors – all it "threatened" to do was to share
well-researched information which would enable donors to make an
informed decision about their donations.
Second, Im Tirtzu never asked that the
university fire anyone. Im Tirtzu believes in freedom of speech. All
it asked is that a solution be found to the extreme bias found in
this department, where only post-Zionist opinions are presented. For
example, modifying the syllabi to ensure students are at least
informed of a spectrum of opinions would have been an appropriate
response.
Third, Im Tirtzu is not a right-wing
organization fighting against the Left. Any effort to portray us as
such is ridiculous. Im Tirtzu is supported by MKs from Labor, Kadima
and the Likud. Our fight is not a fight for the Right but a fight
for Zionism.
Post-Zionists like to misrepresent us, making
it easier to polarize the public against us. However, their efforts
will not work because the facts are against them. Im Tirtzu is a
Zionist organization, period.
Many friends of Im Tirtzu, including Education
Minister
Gideon Sa'ar, have expressed reservations with its campaign.
These reservations are legitimate. However, while it is fair to
disagree with and even criticize Im Tirtzu, it is unfair to
delegitimize it, especially when using lies to do so. All Im Tirtzu
did was tell the university that it will use its right of free
speech to inform donors of its findings.
This is a legitimate action.
We at Im Tirtzu will continue to fight for the
right of every student to speak freely. We will continue to fight
for academic freedom which represents all points of view – including
the Zionist ones.
We yearn for the day when Israel will be an
even more Jewish and democratic state – the day on which the
misinformation of the post-Zionists will disappear and give way to a
truly free public discourse with no intimidation.
The writer is overseas communications
coordinator of Im Tirtzu. He blogs at www.danillouz.com.
|