|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University – David
Newman (Dept of Political Science) attacks IsraCampus.Org.il
IN THE past I have
been attacked for daring to suggest, on the pages of this newspaper,
that the politics of delegitimization practiced in recent years by
such organizations such as Campus Watch, IsraCampus and, most
recently, NGO Monitor have been a contemporary brand of McCarthyism.
But if it was unclear until now, this past week’s events have
highlighted the fact that there is a concerted campaign on the part
of these well-funded organizations to silence and delegitimize
anyone who holds pro-peace, pro-human rights positions, views which
uphold the very best of democratic and Jewish traditions and for
which the State of Israel is rightly proud.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=168266
Borderline Views: The politics
of delegitimization
By
DAVID NEWMAN
09/02/2010
Many of our
supporters are beginning to question whether this country is indeed
a democracy.
When I was growing up in an Orthodox environment in North London,
our teachers and rabbis constantly warned against the dangers of
those who would threaten our basic values and lead us into the paths
of evil and self-destruction. There were different types of enemies.
The outside Christian world was one of them, and we were warned not
to make friends with our non-Jewish neighbors. If, however, on a
vacation we could not resist the urge to peek inside a church to see
their “idol worship,” it could be excused as childish curiosity.
A much greater
enemy, however, was the enemy within. On no account should we even
conceive of becoming friendly with those who professed alternative
forms of Jewish worship – the Conservative and the Reform movements.
Not even curiosity could forgive our desire to see what a Reform
synagogue looked like, with sure divine punishment to follow should
we succumb to our desires. These people, so we were told, are the
epitome of evil – those who pretend to be one of “us” but in reality
would lead us into self-destruction.
I was reminded of
this system of total delegitimization of a perceived enemy during
the past week, following the disgraceful attempt of a right-wing
student organization, Im Tirtzu, to cast vicious aspersions on the
activities of the New Israel Fund and its affiliated NGOs. But this
time, they did not stop at hurling accusations against an
organization which does so much important and positive work in
promoting civil society, human rights and Arab-Jewish dialogue in
Israel. This time they made it very personal in their attempt to
crudely target the current president of NIF, Prof. Naomi Chazan, one
of the country’s foremost political scientists, former head of the
Truman Institute at the Hebrew University, former deputy speaker of
the Knesset and, until this week, a columnist for The Jerusalem
Post. The way in which Im Tirtzu depicted Chazan, with a horn coming
out of her head, reminded many of us of the worst forms of
anti-Semitism.
IN THE past I have
been attacked for daring to suggest, on the pages of this newspaper,
that the politics of delegitimization practiced in recent years by
such organizations such as Campus Watch, IsraCampus and, most
recently, NGO Monitor have been a contemporary brand of McCarthyism.
But if it was unclear until now, this past week’s events have
highlighted the fact that there is a concerted campaign on the part
of these well-funded organizations to silence and delegitimize
anyone who holds pro-peace, pro-human rights positions, views which
uphold the very best of democratic and Jewish traditions and for
which the State of Israel is rightly proud.
Much more alarming
are the links beginning to become apparent between this politics of
delegitimization and the formal offices of government. NGO Monitor
succeeded in co-opting Government Services Minister Michael Eitan
who, until a few months ago, was known as a champion, rather than
his current status as trampler, of democracy. Israeli media coverage
of the assault by Im Tirtzu was translated by the Government Press
Office and distributed, and the issue was also taken up by MK Otniel
Schneller, who is best known for his past leadership and support of
the settler movement.
At the beginning
of this academic year, some university student magazines allowed Im
Tirtzu to publish (paid) advertisements requesting that students
report to them any critical comment which might be voiced by their
lecturers in courses dealing with Israeli politics and society. This
is a copy of the vicious, anti-democratic campaign instituted some
years ago by Campus Watch in North America, which turns students
into spies in the name of a specific political ideology. If this is
not McCarthyism, then I don’t know what is.
I do not belong to
any of these NGOs, nor do I teach my students about Israeli politics
so, unlike the heads of many of these right-wing organizations, I
have no personal interest in making this counterclaim.
The extremist
right-wing organizations rightly demand transparency, and yet fail
to display their own. NGO Monitor refuses to disclose the specifics
of its funding. It refuses to research any of the numerous
right-wing NGOs, many of which support illegal projects beyond the
Green Line and which are funded in North America, and it refuses to
divulge who is funding its use of a major law firm known for its
single-minded opposition to the BBC to take a case to the European
Court of Justice regarding left-wing NGOs.
Who indeed is
funding this latest campaign of Im Tirtzu to trample freedom of
speech and activity within our dying democracy? What is the paper
trail which links all these campaigns to their supporters in the
Knesset, the government and the Foreign Ministry? Perhaps we should
not be surprised, given the extremist nature of the country’s
Foreign Ministry today, having succeeded in the space of a year in
worsening our relations with Europe, with Turkey and creating the
exact opposite of what a Foreign Ministry is meant to do –
diplomacy.
This is clearly
the reason why our ambassadors in such important places as
Washington and London have taken increasingly right-wing stances in
many of their recent public utterances and have constantly refused
to meet with the many pro-Israel but left-wing, progressive and
pro-peace lobbies which are fast becoming a dominant part of
Diaspora Jewry and are challenging the hegemony of the community
establishments.
As alternative,
pro-Israel, pro-peace, pro-human rights movements gradually take
center stage, the only way to combat them is through this use of the
politics of delegitimization, and to portray their pro-Israel
positions as anti-Jewish, anti-Israel, Jewish self-haters and the
divulgers of information to the anti-Semites.
OF GREATEST
concern is the fact that these attempts at delegitimization are
causing great damage to Israel’s image. Many of our supporters are
now beginning to question whether Israel is indeed a democracy.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of senior academics, who do not support
boycotts and for whom the idea of delegitimizing Israel is as far
removed from their thoughts as can be imagined, are writing letters
of protest to university presidents, to government ministers and to
leading international papers. Public figures and journalists are
protesting the concerted right-wing campaign to silence all critics.
In adopting self-appointed positions of superpatriotism, the
right-wing groups are causing far greater damage to Israel than any
of the real enemies out there, be they of the radical Right or the
radical Left.
It is time to
stand up and be counted. The Left cannot afford the continued luxury
of silence. University presidents must come out in public against
all those false supporters who use the power of their pocketbook to
threaten Israeli academics because of their perceived political
views. Government ministers must come out strongly against all
attempts to falsely portray progressive supporters of Israel and
human rights as anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic. By remaining silent,
they will not be able to distance themselves from the next letter
bomb (such as the one which exploded at the house of Prof. Ze’ev
Sternhell of the Hebrew University) when it occurs.
The concerted attempts to delegitimize and
silence more than half of the country’s citizens and its progressive
supporters throughout the world must be exposed for what they really
are. We must demand that these organizations become transparent,
that they too reveal their sources of funding and, if they exist,
their links to government and even to ministers. Failure to do so
will, at the end of the day, damage Israel’s rapidly fading
democracy beyond all repair.
The writer is professor of political
geography at Ben-Gurion University and editor of the International
Journal of Geopolitics.
|