|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University – David
Newman (Dept of Political Science) feels the heat from a peeved
Board of Trustees due to his contributions to an anti-Semitic
documentary on British Channel 4
Prof. David Newman from the Department of
Politics and Government at Ben Gurion University has already
experienced persecution by the Board of Trustees of the institution
where he teaches. A month ago he received an angry e-mail from
Michael Gross,, who sits on the University’s Board of Trustees,
following an appearance on the British Channel 4 television. In the
e-mail, Gross threatens to use all of his influence to fire Newman.
He uses very strong language, to the point of death wishes
Members of the faculty of humanities at the
university are organizing a petition that will be sent to the
Chairman of the Board of Trustees Roy Zuckerberg, who lives in New
York, to protest Gross’s e-mails. “It is an example of how a
university donor who lives abroad (Gross lives in England) is trying
to take over the university’s agenda,” said a faculty member. Newman
would only say this week: “Others are fighting for me, not I for
others, and I prefer not to talk about it.”
http://www.tamingkorach.com/?p=741
“Anti-Semites” How human rights activists
became public enemies
Their families disown them, the universities persecute them, the
Shabak wiretaps them, police harass them and the Knesset curtails
them. Who will take care of the human rights of the human rights
activists?
Shai Greenberg and Neta Ahituv, Ha’ir [Haaretz
Tel-Aviv weekly] [cover story],
December 11 2009
A month and a half ago, Noa Kaufman, an
activist for the organization Israeli Children, fighting to regulate
the status of the children of migrant workers, was woken by the ring
of her cell phone at 4 a.m.. On the other end of the line was a male
voice: “the public is not against the expulsion, you bitch.” He hung
up. He called again, and when she didn’t answer he left a message:
“you filthy Ashkenazi bitch, too bad Hitler didn’t finish you off.
Come to the Shapira neighborhood and just watch what we do to you.
We’re going to catch you tomorrow and kill you.”
Another recipient of that kind of invective is
Tel Aviv Council member Yael Ben Yefet, who acted in City Hall
against arresting the children and banishing them from central
Israel. Ben Yefet, who is also the director of Hakeshet Hademocratit
Hamizrahit, received an anonymous fax to her office saying: “if you
knew what was going on these days in the southern neighborhoods, you
would be ashamed of yourselves, you token Sephardic ass kissers of
the Ashkenazi racists who hate you. We are talking to you too, Yefet,
you wimp. It is nice and warm in the Ashkenazis’ butts, but doesn’t
it stink?”
Eitan Bronstein, CEO of the Zochrot
organization, also received death threats. “We called on the public
to join a march of commemoration of the Nakba and I received an
anonymous phone call: ‘by April 17 you will no longer be alive. We
are going to make sure of that.’ Then there were other calls, to my
cell phone and the office.” Bronstein is already used to being
cursed on the phone. In the last year he was interviewed a few times
on Shmuel Plato Sharon’s program on Radio Radius. “Plato, who has
very nationalist opinions, called me throughout the interview
‘murderer,’ ‘anti-Semite,’ and he even said: ‘I hope they throw you
out of the country.’”
It looks as if that kind of talk has become
legitimate in Israel, 2009, as long as it is aimed at human rights
activists, of course. There is a consensus that it is okay to abuse
them with violent talkbacks, rabid radio programs, graffiti
polluting the public thoroughfares and of course also personally,
individually, as shall be demonstrated below. The truth is we should
not be surprised by that vulgar treatment. Recently several official
parties have given support to the delegitimization of those
organizations. The Interior Ministry spokesperson, Sabine Hadad, for
example, who in an opinion piece she published on the Walla website
last August called the demonstrators against expelling migrant
workers “precious children who do not understand the reality of life
but insist on calling themselves human rights activists;” or the
official Yitzhak Drexler, head of the guarantees unit in the
Interior Ministry, who wrote in his answer to a request by the Elem
organization on behalf of the son of a migrant worker: “try not to
defend criminals and attach them to our people and the Land of
Israel.” The same Drexler wrote to the Hotline for Migrant Workers
that they “represent criminals and help them extinguish morality
from the Land of Israel.”
It is quite possible that those two Interior
Ministry officials were inspired by their minister Eli Yishai, who
called the migrant worker and refugee aid organizations “a threat to
the Zionist enterprise.” By the way, Yishai was speaking in defense
of Tziki Sela, the former commander of the Oz unit, who himself
called the organizations in an interview with Maariv, “anarchists
who want to destroy Israel.”
This week 11 human and civil rights
organizations wrote a letter to the president, the prime minister
and the Knesset speaker, asking for a meeting to discuss the
delegitimization of their groups. Simultaneously, tomorrow (Friday)
40 organizations will hold the first human rights march in Israel,
leaving Rabin Square at 11 and ending at the Cinematheque. Among the
performers will be the Dag Nachash group and Alma Zohar. The purpose
of the event is to protest against the poor state of human rights in
Israel, as reflected in a report published this week by ACRI, about
the deterioration of democracy in Israel. But right before the
organizations unite to protest the injustice caused to all of the
disempowered groups in Israel and the occupied territories, it is
worth aiming the spotlight at the organizations themselves — another
sector that has been excluded from society.
In the family: daughter, I’m glad the Shabak
is on to you
Ruth, an activist for the Gisha organization
that defends the Palestinians’ right of movement, this week
described how she broke up with her partner, a high-tech worker,
after his family constantly criticized her occupation: “It is a
family from Ra’anana, educated people, middle class, mainstream, but
they were hostile about my work in a human rights organization that
defends Palestinian rights. They said things like ‘that is not
Zionist,’ ‘charity begins at home,’ ‘they are to blame for their
situation,’ and the most lethal statement of all, especially coming
from a family that called itself leftist: “Better 100 (dead)
Palestinian children than one Israeli soldier.’”
What bothered them most, says Ruth, were
concerns about the family’s economic and social future. Statements
like “it could threaten ours son’s career, inhibit his promotion,”
or “you have to think of the children you are going to have. This
work can put you at risk. What will happen when she takes them to a
demonstration at Bil’in?” “What do I have to do with Bil’in?”
protests Ruth. “Our work is on a different level, it is legal work
on the basis of international human rights laws, representing people
whose freedom of movement has been violated. Their reactions, and
reactions from society in general, show that what is important is to
protect Jewish rights. The suffering of others is not perceived as
something we need to care about. It was very hard to penetrate that
exhausting conversation and finally we broke up.”
Vered Cohen Barzilai, Amnesty spokeswoman and a
former crime, law and health reporter for Channel 10, had similar
experiences: “I come from a right wing home and six years ago, when
I made a career change from journalism to human rights, I parted
with many friends, including my best friend. When I told her I work
for Amnesty she spat on the floor three times and threw me out of
her office saying: ‘what do you think, that if you make friends with
Arabs you will be safe from terrorist attacks?’”
Many of the activists we talked to cited their
families’ attitudes as the hardest thing for them to deal with. One
activist said that his family’s excommunication reached cyberspace:
“When my father realized I talk about work on Facebook, he
unfriended me.” Another activist, who asked not to reveal her name
or the name of the organization where she volunteers, tells of a
conversation she had with her father a year ago after he decided to
cancel his subscription to the New York Times, after he read that
the US wiretaps terrorists, undermining the security agencies’
ability to act against them. “Do you know that the Israeli security
agencies, especially the Shabak, listen to my calls too?” asked the
daughter, and was astonished when her father answered: “okay, I
think they want to make sure you are not going too far.”
At the University: what are the lecturers
afraid of?
University lecturers also say they are being
silenced. It is done by the website of an organization called Israel
Academia Monitor, which systematically documents every academic,
from students to professors, who the website operators believe
“undermines Jewish Zionist interests,” including signing petitions,
attending conferences, speaking to the media and writing articles
that criticize government policy towards the Palestinians. “Based on
that monitoring, the organization submits an annual report to the
various universities’ boards of trustees, with the warning ‘this is
what people do with your money,’” says Dr. Amiel Vardi, a lecturer
in classical studies at Hebrew University and an activist in
Ta’ayush.
“Yes, we definitely monitor academics who want
to destroy Israel,” confirms site editor Dana Barnet, “based on what
they write or say at international conferences or interviews to the
media. Academics who call at international conferences to boycott
Israel, or cooperate with pro-Arab organizations such as Adala and
B’Tselem, we all have to know what they are doing. We definitely
think that just because of our monitoring those academics curtailed
their activities.”
Prof. David Newman from the Department of
Politics and Government at Ben Gurion University has already
experienced persecution by the Board of Trustees of the institution
where he teaches. A month ago he received an angry e-mail from
Michael Gross,, who sits on the University’s Board of Trustees,
following an appearance on the British Channel 4 television. In the
e-mail, Gross threatens to use all of his influence to fire Newman.
He uses very strong language, to the point of death wishes
Members of the faculty of humanities at the
university are organizing a petition that will be sent to the
Chairman of the Board of Trustees Roy Zuckerberg, who lives in New
York, to protest Gross’s e-mails. “It is an example of how a
university donor who lives abroad (Gross lives in England) is trying
to take over the university’s agenda,” said a faculty member. Newman
would only say this week: “Others are fighting for me, not I for
others, and I prefer not to talk about it.”
On the ground: what does the public care?
An important part of the prosecution of human
rights activists is their harassment by security forces. They say it
got much worse after the latest operation in Gaza. Dafna Banai, of
MachsomWatch (and the wife of the actor Gavri Banai), says that “at
the demonstration that took place at that time against the operation
in Gaza, people hit my friend and spit in her face, and members of
the police anti-terror unit just sat around laughing. When we wanted
to file a complaint the police prevented us from reaching the
assailant. When we asked them to arrest him they stood between us
and him, pulled him over and asked him to leave. We have the feeling
nobody is defending us. Soldiers too. Lots of times they stand
around and encourage the settlers to attack us. They say ‘yeah,
good, go on,’ or just stand and watch and start laughing when older
women are attacked by thugs.”
In one case, half a year ago, Banai received a
traffic ticket for “something crazy that never happened,” she
claims. “A policeman threw up a wildcat checkpoint on a road in the
territories,” she says, “and when we (the MachsomWatch women) see a
thing like that we stop to film it. I stood on a side road and the
policeman got angry that we were standing there and watching him. He
claimed I was standing on a white stripe on an intercity highway,
that I wasn’t wearing a shiny vest and that I drove in reverse
without another person guiding me. None of it is true, I filmed
everything. He gave me a 250 shekel fine just because he didn’t want
us to stop there.”
Leah Shakdiel, a religious feminist from
Yeroham, who works without an organizational framework, tells of an
incident that happened to her about a year ago: “On January 14 I
joined a protest vigil in Beersheva of the Jewish-Arab Darom Shalom
group. A protest vigil, by law, does not need a police license. It
is a group of people standing in one place, not disturbing traffic,
not marching and just holding signs. But the police decided to
interrupt us actively. Police came to the corner where we were
standing, at a pretty central location, stopped traffic and created
chaos. The officer pulled out a megaphone and said it was an illegal
demonstration, that we had 15 minutes to disperse and that if we
didn’t there would be arrests. Three minutes later the police were
dragging people into patrol cars. I innocently thought they asked us
to disperse because our gathering was dangerous in terms of Qassams.
I thought the police were really worried about our safety. But then
the police ganged up on somebody standing next to me to take his
camera away and dragged me with him to the patrol car. There were
six of us who were arrested. We were released to alternative arrest
at 10 p.m., to house arrest. I received a restraining order from
Beersheva for two weeks. The police told me ‘demonstrate in Yeroham,
not here.’
“The whole business was unprofessional and
irresponsible. We were charged with unruly behavior and an illegal
demonstration but we were neither unruly nor anything. While we were
under arrest they didn’t tell us we have the right to a lawyer. They
yelled at me that if I did not sign on to alternative arrest without
a lawyer, as I asked, they would leave me at the police station all
night. I was under house arrest for five days. It harmed my ability
to make a living as a lecturer on Judaism and feminism at
pre-military seminars and the Sapir College. Since indictments were
served, we have access to the evidence material against us, and we
have a copy of the film the police itself made, that shows we were
standing on the sidewalk quietly, holding signs in Arabic and
Hebrew. In the end the charges against most of us were dropped out
of lack of public interest. They weren’t dropped for lack of
evidence because they want to continue harassing the photographer
who was arrested with us and who still has a charge sheet pending
against him. I know the police saw him at another demonstration and
looked for an opportunity to harass him.”
In opposite cases, activists say, when they are
the ones who file complaints for harassment, the police move very
slowly. “In August 2008 settlers slashed my tires near an illegal
outpost,” says Dafna Banai, “and broke my MachsomWatch flag that was
attached to the car. When I got back a week later, I saw the flag
hanging on their tent. I complained to the police and was answered
that there is no public interest. One of our drivers had his jaw
broken by settlers who punched him with fists. Then too we
complained to the police and nothing came of it. There is never
public interest. There is never proof. There were cases when our
women were attacked and in the end the police took our identity
cards and let the settlers watch.”
In the investigation rooms: closed cases
only
The institutional harassment of the
organizations does not stop at the level of the foot soldier. In
many cases the order is given at the highest level. In May 2007 it
was reported that the Shabak uses surveillance when there is
“subversive activity against the state’s Jewish character,” even if
it is legal activity. The head of the Shabak Yuval Diskin declared
at the time that that authority “is important to Israeli democracy,”
and many activists say they feel it on their persons and on their
cell phone lines. But the Shabak doesn’t only eavesdrop. In June
2008 Salah Hajj Yihya, head of the Physicians for Human Rights
mobile unit, was taken to a Shabak investigation into the
organization’s activities. In the investigation he was asked what
the budget is, who the donors are, how they go into the territories
and transport patients from Gaza to Israel and whether they had met
Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniya. “I prefer not to bring that up
all over again,” he asked this week. “They claimed we exploit
humanitarian activity for political activity. Nonsense.”
And speaking of PHR, in a phone call last year
between Dr. Yoram Snir, a department head at Soroka and a senior
figure in the hospital, and Anat Litvin, head of the organization’s
detainee department, Snir called it “an organization of enemies of
Israel” and hung up. This week the CEO of Adala received a phone
call from a man who threatened his life. “We’re used to it,” they
explain indifferently.
Three months after the investigation of Salah
Hajj Yihya, in September 2008, a police investigation opened against
the organization New Profile, with the approval of the attorney
general and state attorney. The police suspected the organization
was helping youth dodge military service. On the eve of last
Memorial Day it raided activists’ homes at 7 a.m., confiscated their
personal computers and forbade them from talking to each other.
“They even took my nine-year-old daughter’s computer,” said Miriam
Hadar, the organization’s chairman, “and since I work from home I
was stuck with my work as editor and translator of articles on
psychoanalysis and gender theory at the university.”
Last November the investigation closed after
lasting almost a year. The files against the activists closed on
grounds of lack of evidence and lack of guilt. To the public they
are still enemies, apparently. Just last week two organization
activists were prevented from distributing flyers at a conference
organized by Chief of Staff Gaby Ashkenazi for high school
principals at Binyanei Hauma. “We went to Jerusalem, two middle-aged
women, we got there half an hour before the conference to give out
flyers,” says New Profile’s current chairman, Rivka Sue (?). “Two
guards came up to us and clung to us and made us back up to the
gate. The female guard called a policeman and he asked us if we have
a license to demonstrate. I asked ‘what demonstration?’ He sighed
and said: ‘what do you care? Go.’”
Three months ago it was three members of Yesh
Gvul who were called in for a police investigation. Police entered
the offices of Hamoked – Center for the Defense of the Individual,
looking for a computer somebody from New Profile used to work on,
didn’t find it and left. The joke going around the organizations
this week was that at the entrance to the rally they are planning
tomorrow the police will throw up checkpoints and take fingerprints
for the biometric database, that was approved by the Knesset this
week.
An escalation in the silencing process
It seems as if last week the attempt to silence
the organizations and close down their funding escalated. It
happened at a special conference at the Knesset called by NGO
Monitor with the Institute for Zionist Strategy. The goal: to
discuss the “transparency” of the donations the organizations
receive from abroad. “Even though foreign funding for organizations
in Israel is labeled as aid to ‘civil society,’ that is an erroneous
definition,” said Prof. Gerald Steinberg, CEO of NGO Monitor, at the
conference. “Organizations such as Physicians for Human Rights,
B’Tselem and Hamoked cannot claim they are at the center of Israeli
civil society and at the same time be directly funded by the Swedish
government.”
The minister for improving service to the
public, Michael Eitan, and MK Ze’ev Elkin, who moderated the
conference, initiated a draft law demanding that every document
issued by the organization be obligated to mention all of the donors
connected to it, even on the nametags activists wear at conferences.
The law says severely that if they do not do so they will bear
personal responsibility carrying a sanction of up to three years in
prison. “We assume this will cause the foreign governments not to
transfer the money because they have domestic opposition, too, and
the taxpaying public will not accept the fact that their government
is involved in the domestic affairs of another country,” Minister
Eitan explained to the conference, attended mostly by American
Jewish men in skullcaps.
The organizations were invited to the
conference but chose to avoid it. Instead of coming they published a
joint response: “We practice that principle in our own behavior,”
they write, but we have “the blunt impression that under the banner
of’ ‘transparency,’ there are some who wish to further different
goals: that the conference you have undertaken to lead is meant
first of all to delegitimize human rights and social change
organizations in Israel.” B’Tselem spokesman Sarit Michael adds that
funding of the organizations is only half a percentage of the total
amount the EU devotes to various activities in Israel. “In 2007 the
EU allocated €261 million, of which €241 million went to
universities and researchers. If Israel wants to disconnect its
human rights community from European funding, it should take into
account that universities, hospitals and other research institutions
will have to give up the funding they receive from Europe.”
The Binyanei Hauma management says in reaction:
“The Binyanei Hauma Congress Center is a large complex that rents
its grounds to events meant for the invitees of the organizers and
them only. As such, the Congress Center has to maintain security
services, who are responsible for the safety of conference
attendees, and are also instructed to prevent private marketing
activity without prior approval on the complex grounds. An inquiry
we made following your question showed that in the incident in
question there was an event for school principals with the minister
of education and the Chief of Staff. The event was secured in
coordination with the unit for the protection of VIPs and the Israel
Police, which were present. People came to the event and began
distributing fliers. The security detail told them that the northern
plaza and parking lots are part of the grounds of the event and that
they must not distribute flyers on the grounds. The security team
also told them politely that if they are invited to the event they
can continue attending it but without distributing flyers or
alternatively they can leave the grounds and give the flyers out on
Shazar street outside of Binyanei Hauma. When a few women refused to
cooperate with the guards, in order to prevent a provocation, a
policeman was asked to intervene.”
Ben Gurion University did not respond by the
time of closing.
|