|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University BGU Prof Israel David
Determines that the Demise of BGU's Imbalanced Pol-Sci Dept is
Inevitable Based on his Insider Information
Ben Gurion University has found itself at a fork in the road, where it is
being required to provide clear and non-evasive answers to Israel's
Council on Higher Education, the public body that oversees higher
education in Israel. As the reader no doubt recalls, this Council
earlier appointed an international panel of professional evaluation
for the department of politics at BGU, and that panel recommended
shutting down the department of politics altogether, unless the
severe academic and professional shoddiness and incompetence there
would be cured.
There are indeed quite a few "imbalances" at Ben Gurion University.
Take for example the fact that nine out of the eleven tenured
faculty members in the department of politics at BGU, as well as a
great many of the non-tenured faculty members there, are radical
extremist seditious far-leftist activists. [Actually, all 11 tenured
faculty members are far-leftist activists Isracampus] The chance
that such a department could have emerged by chance is far lower
than the chance of winning millions in the lottery. It should be
noted that no similar "coincidence" can be found at any other
university! Therefore there can be no doubt that this department was
constructed intentionally using the "One friend brings in another
friend" method of nepotism, and that in turn is the source of the
absence of professional and scientific standards in the department.
The imbalance of interest when it comes to the department of
politics is the imbalance of purpose. The bulk of faculty members in
the department have no idea what the mission of an academic
institution is
[The current chairman of the department, Dr. Dani]
Filc believes the mission of the department is advocacy, whereas the
proper mission of an academic unit is research and instruction. Much
more serious is Filc's inability to understand that it is NOT a
proper function for an academic department to persecute and harass
Israeli army officers, smearing them as "war criminals," nor to
vandalize Israeli military security points and checkpoints, nor to
infiltrate illegally into Arafat's headquarters in Ramallah and
there get photographed in warm embrace with Arafat (which a faculty
member in this department has already done), nor to organize violent
illegal "protests" (some of which have already been the subject of
prosecution in BGU disciplinary committees).
Shutting down the department of politics at BGU is a matter of great
seriousness. There are precedents in Israel for doing so
And that
is what has to be done at BGU!
Shut it Down, Don't Try to Make it "Balanced"!!
Complete closing down of the Department of Politics and
Government at Ben Gurion University is Now Essential
By Professor Israel David, Ben Gurion University
Op-ed in Maariv
January 30, 2012
(translated by Steven Plaut, Isracampus)
Ben Gurion University has found itself at a fork in the road, where it is
being required to provide clear and non-evasive answers to Israel's
Council on Higher Education, the public body that oversees higher
education in Israel. As the reader no doubt recalls, this Council
earlier appointed an international panel of professional evaluation
for the department of politics at BGU, and that panel recommended
shutting down the department of politics altogether, unless the
severe academic and professional shoddiness and incompetence there
would be cured. Numerous academics publicly endorsed the panel's
criticisms and recommendations. There was some dissent however
regarding the panel's sharp criticism of the BGU department of
politics for its absence of any balance or pluralism. Complaints
about the absence of balance have been voiced by many, including the
"Im Tirtzu" Zionist student movement. Even the President of Ben
Gurion University, Prof. Rivka Carmi, published her own announcement
in the media with reference to the recent politics departmental
"conference," in which she expressed disappointment at the lack of
balance and pluralism there.
Anyone with any sense of how academia works will understand at once that
the members of the panel were trying to avoid explicitly addressing
the heart of the problems here, and preferred to prettify them by
attributing them to the absence of "balance." Let us say upfront
that there is no real basis for mandating that "balance" be
maintained at academic conferences. A conference of physicists
describing the roundness of the earth need not grant equal time to
those insisting the earth is flat. So just what sort of "balance" is
deemed desirable and who should establish the rules for it?
There are indeed quite a few "imbalances" at Ben Gurion University. Take
for example the fact that nine out of the eleven tenured faculty
members in the department of politics at BGU, as well as a great
many of the non-tenured faculty members there, are radical extremist
seditious far-leftist activists. [Actually, all 11 tenured faculty
members are far-leftist activists Isracampus] The chance that such
a department could have emerged by chance is far lower than the
chance of winning millions in the lottery. It should be noted that
no similar "coincidence" can be found at any other university!
Therefore there can be no doubt that this department was constructed
intentionally using the "One friend brings in another friend" method
of nepotism, and that in turn is the source of the absence of
professional and scientific standards in the department. When the
international panel complained about the absence of core subjects in
the curriculum and research of the department of politics, the
department members themselves not only conceded that the point was
correct but expressed pride in it! The result is that the
Arab-Israeli conflict (or the leftist anti-Israel take on it)
occupies over 90% of the focus of attention in the department of
politics at BGU. At no university in the world would you find a
situation where 90% of the faculty in physics are all dealing with a
single sub-topic within the discipline. There are oodles of topics
in physics deserving of attention. Nor would a basic physics course
consist only of citations of a single scientist because the
instructor happened to have studied that scientist, even if that
scientist were Einstein.
The imbalance of interest when it comes to the department of politics is
the imbalance of purpose. The bulk of faculty members in the
department have no idea what the mission of an academic institution
is. The current chairman of the department, Dr. Dani Filc, responded
to the recommendation of the international panel, speaking on
Israel's Channel Two television. "It is a plot to silence us," he
said, and here we see the nucleus of the problem. Filc believes the
mission of the department is advocacy, whereas the proper mission of
an academic unit is research and instruction. Much more serious is
Filc's inability to understand that it is NOT a proper function for
an academic department to persecute and harass Israeli army
officers, smearing them as "war criminals," nor to vandalize Israeli
military security points and checkpoints, nor to infiltrate
illegally into Arafat's headquarters in Ramallah and there get
photographed in warm embrace with Arafat (which a faculty member in
this department has already done), nor to organize violent illegal
"protests" (some of which have already been the subject of
prosecution in BGU disciplinary committees). Such circus activities
have no place in academia. They interfere with and distort all
efforts at education and research. Moreover, the shenanigans of the
department of politics at BGU undermine the reputation of every one
of us at BGU. Those indeed were the very words of President Rivka
Carmi in a statement issued in response to the calls by Neve Gordon
(who was department chairman at the time) in the Los Angeles Times
and the Guardian (UK) for an international boycott against Israel!
Shutting down the department of politics at BGU is a matter of great
seriousness. There are precedents in Israel for doing so. Where
there was significant student demand for studies in such a
department, then in those precedent cases the department was
completely rebuilt from scratch after a respite. And that is what
has to be done at BGU!
Israel David teaches mathematics and operations research at Ben Gurion
University.
|