IsraCampus.Org.il

True, dirty laundry should be washed at home, but boycotting Israel has long been heard internationally. Baseless, outrageous, counter-productive and basically a very valuable weapon, these cries against Israel stem from innate, deeply embedded hatred. It is purely and simply anti-Semitism. Professor Gordon’s demand is no different than Prof. Myers’s position that kidnapping Israeli soldiers is a justifiable weapon. The aftermath of the LA Times article teaches two things: First, donor revolt is a very valuable tool and withholding funding garners attention. Second, the Israeli and Jewish communities have slowly accepted the realization they are at war. Now they must focus on the Israeli Public Diplomacy front, where the battle is raging and they are mounting incalculable losses.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2330332/posts

Stop Blaming the Messenger

By Ari Bussel
Sep 2, 2009

Ten days ago, the Los Angeles Times published an Op-Ed by an Israeli Professor from Ben Gurion University of the Negev (BGU). The article called for a boycott of Israel. It was neither on the front page nor written by a known anti-Semite, but the community is up in arms.

Suddenly, the local Jewish community in Greater Los Angeles finds the message delivered daily by the Los Angeles Times unpleasant. I say suddenly, but over the past three decades, there have been repeated calls to cancel subscriptions and withdraw advertisement dollars, to very little or no avail. The Los Angeles Times main readership remains Jewish, as are many of its advertisers.

If most readers were enemies of Israel, they would be dancing in the streets – like the Palestinians and other Arabs on the morning of September 11^th, 2001. Their wholehearted support of the publication and general euphoria would have drowned out any opposing views. The uproar indicates the readership remains predominantly Jewish.

The morning of the article, I received a call from an outraged major donor to Israeli causes asking what to do. I took it in stride, suggesting the only effective way to fight is to withhold funding. It took him just a few minutes to call me back. He is a member of a very influential circle of friends whose names every person would recognize. Only one of these is a major BGU donor and half the University is named for his and his wife’s contributions.

Many were outraged and an Israeli advocacy group on campus called for a demonstration against the professor who authored the piece. The local Israeli paper ran full-page interviews with both the local Israeli Consul General and the President of the University. The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles financially benefited from the Op-Ed when the American Associates of BGU bought a full-page ad. The Executive VP of the American Associates suggested he would “be happy to help [Dr. Gordon] pack” if he chooses “a home that more closely identifies with [his] values and beliefs.”

This was just the tip of the iceberg: today, Prof. Rivka Carmi, the President of BGU was allowed an equal platform and her main argument was, “like it or not, Gordon cannot be readily dismissed.” What a field day for the Los Angeles Times. Last week at an Anti-Defamation League function, I listened to a disgruntled person who had already contacted the Op-Ed editor four times. But suddenly, I found myself in the peculiar position of defending the newspaper.

Clearly, Prof. Gordon touched a very raw nerve, and has done so in the minds of major BGU donors. Money, my friends, is a great catalyst for change. Withholding donor funding, a most effective weapon.

The problem is not an Israeli’s call to boycott Israel. Too many others in academia share harmful positions against the Jewish Homeland. Closer to home, UCLA’s David Myers caused a mini-storm with his Op-Ed published at exactly the same time in the Jewish Journal, a very left-leaning paper.

What is unique about Ben Gurion University of the Negev is the name it carries and its location in Be’er Sheva, the capital city of the Southern part of Israel, home to 900,000 Israelis. Across the street is its associate Soroka Hospital. David Ben Gurion’s vision for the future of the Jewish Homeland, and his realization very late in life of the need to support what is right, not what is politically convenient, is the reason he chose to be buried in the Negev.

At B