|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University Senior
Lecturer of Middle East History Haggai Ram (home
page here) claims Israel is inventing the threat from Iran in
order to oppress Palestinians.
'By playing up the purported genocidal threat
issuing from Iran, the Netanyahu government thus hopes to avoid
making any concessions that are likely to bring about a meaningful
breakthrough in the Israeli-Palestinian impasse. "The message is:
Iran is an existential threat to Israel; settlements are not," as an
Israeli official recently told The Guardian.... because such
expressions have thus far enabled the Jewish state to exacerbate,
rather than help to alleviate, the Palestinian problem. It is this
yet-to-be resolved problem - and not Iran - that presents the Jewish
state with the most serious challenge to its survival.'
http://www.juancole.com/2009/09/ram-israel-and-iranian-threat.html
Ram: "Israel
and the Iranian Threat"
Haggai Ram writes in a guest editorial for
IC:
September 29, 2009
Before, during and after the recent UN
General Assembly meeting, the Israeli government, much like
Sisyphus, who was condemned to repeat forever a meaningless task,
once again stepped up its campaign against Iran’s nuclear program.
The immediate objective is patently clear: to push the United
Nations Security Council to expand sanctions against Iran and
perhaps also to lay down the justification for a future Israeli
preemptive strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities.
The tactic used is not new either. It
consists of a well known, well orchestrated endeavor to conjure up a
radioactively reified picture of Iran as a Nazi Germany-like power
obsessively bent on making good on its alleged pledge to have the
Jewish state “wiped off the map.” Thus, on a recent trip to Russia
Israeli President Shimon Peres described the prospects of an Iranian
nuclear bomb in ominous terms as “a flying concentration camp”; and
Netanyahu, while on a trip to Germany, warned Iran that Israel will
not allow “those who wish to perpetrate mass deaths, those who call
for the destruction of the Jewish people or the Jewish state, to go
unchallenged.”
In assessing the Jewish state’s
unrelenting recourse to drawing analogies between Iran and Nazi
Germany, one should not dismiss the genuine feelings of
vulnerability among Israelis stemming from the trauma of the Jewish
Holocaust during World War II. This explains, in part, why despite
Israel’s overwhelming military superiority and its own nuclear
arsenal, Israeli Jews today are deeply concerned about the
likelihood of an impending “second” Holocaust. However misplaced and
exaggerated, the reality of such feelings, their importance, must be
recognized.
Persistently voicing venomous anti-Israel
rhetoric and allegedly pursuing nuclear weapons capabilities, the
Iranian government, no doubt, has not been helpful in reducing these
misplaced anxieties. To these we should add the reverberations of
the electoral earthquake that has shaken the Islamic republic to its
core since last June. Indeed, the fraudulent presidential elections
and their aftermath have demonstrated to the Israelis the brutal
force which that government is prepared to unleash - even against
its own people - in order to ensure its survival.
Yet one should also not ignore the dubious
dividends that the Israeli government now expects to reap from
producing such tenuous analogies. It is no secret that the Obama
administration has been exploring ways to bringing about the
resumption of the long-stalled Middle East talks. To that end, it
has mounted pressure on Israel to agree to a partial freeze on the
construction of settlements on occupied Palestinian land. By playing
up the purported genocidal threat issuing from Iran, the Netanyahu
government thus hopes to avoid making any concessions that are
likely to bring about a meaningful breakthrough in
|