Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University -
LA Times readers express their dissatisfaction with Neve Gordon’s
call for boycott
-----Original Message-----
From: marion dreyfus
Sent: Tue, Aug 25, 2009 6:32 pm
Subject: letter to editor printed in the LAT (on Neve Gordon)
Gordon has always been quixotic, anti-Israel,
anti-Jewish and now, anti-common sense.
Boycotting his own country is clearly an
extreme and bizarre position for his bizarrely held views, and both
are problematic for his neighbors and co-religionists.
Marion DS Dreyfus
Atlanta
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/letters/la-le-tuesday25-2009aug25,0,2210064,full.story
Boycott: Good or bad?
Re “Boycott Israel,” Opinion, Aug. 20
The Op-Ed article by Neve Gordon is a statement
on why Israel should not be boycotted. Gordon, a leftist in Israel,
has complete rights of free speech. Israel is the only true
democracy in the Middle East. Not only does he have the right to ask
for a boycott, so can all the Israeli Arabs who live as free people
in Israel as well.
But one thing that Gordon does not consider is
that boycotting Israel is a detriment to the Israeli people as well
as to the Palestinians, some of whom work in Israel to support their
families.
The call for a boycott is unjustified and
undignified from someone who teaches and has access to the media.
Allyson Rowen Taylor
Valley Glen
Gordon expresses the frustration many feel at
the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- including many of us who
care deeply about Israel's future.
The answer, however, isn't to divest, boycott
or sanction -- steps that deepen Israel's sense of isolation and
increase the antagonism that surrounds the issue. Instead, let's
invest our energy in a positive campaign to support what is likely
to be a serious push by President Obama to achieve a two-state
solution and broader regional peace.
Ideologues on all sides will oppose the
president. Let all of goodwill who seek a just, two-state resolution
rally to support him.
Jeremy Ben-Ami
Washington
The writer is the executive director of J Street, a Jewish group in
Washington that advocates for Mideast peace.
We Diaspora Jews are embarrassed by corrupt
rabbis and Jewish crooks, as American Christians are embarrassed by
corrupt members of their clergy, and we know that the state of
Israel's actions have increased global anti-Semitism.
However, we all know that our U.S. democracy
will survive as a nation. Gordon's very courageous Op-Ed article
indicates that he is not so sure of the fate of his nation.
In my opinion, the problem is that the state of
Israel calls itself a democracy. It does not qualify because all of
its citizens are not equal in the eyes of the government. Arabs are
second-class citizens. Religious Zionists and government-supported
settlements are blocking a two-state solution with the Palestinians.
The state of Israel is a de facto Jewish
republic, which is not what Gordon wants for his children.
Martin J. Weisman
Westlake Village
This man cares about Israel, and his article is
something that should be read by every American and Israeli. There
will be no peace until Israel grants Palestinians equal rights.
Gordon Reed
Huntington Beach
Only a Jewish Israeli citizen has the guts to
speak his mind on the boycott issue. Anyone else supporting this is
labeled anti-Semitic. I am pleased that The Times printed this Op-Ed
article.
Rizek Abusharr
Claremont
Boycotting Israel is unbalanced and morally
unjust.
The policy effectively holds Israel solely
accountable for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It ignores the
deliberate cruelty and immorality of Palestinian terror, the failure
of Arab states (with the notable exceptions of Egypt and Jordan) to
recognize Israel's legitimacy and rightful place in the region, and
the fact that terrorists and their sponsors who are bent on Israel's
destruction are the primary obstacles to peace.
The peace process will only succeed when both
Israelis and Palestinians feel safe and secure.
The author correctly notes that a boycott will
make my fellow Israeli citizens feel singled out and persecuted as
Jews. This strategy will only undermine Israel's sense of security
and prove counterproductive to finding a just and lasting peace.
Naty Saidoff
Los Angeles
The writer is a representative of the American Jewish Committee.
Gordon concedes that "the Israel peace camp has
gradually dwindled so that today it is almost nonexistent."
In free and open democratic debate, Gordon and
those who agree with him have failed to convince the Israeli people
that their proposals will bring peace and an end to the almost
90-year war by the Arabs against the Jews in Palestine. There is no
logical necessity to assume that Gordon is sincere simply because he
lives in Israel with his family. But assuming he is sincere, there
is absolutely no reason to believe he possesses godlike
infallibility.
Herbert Roth
Indian Wells
Gordon has always been quixotic, anti-Israel,
anti-Jewish and now, anti-common sense.
Boycotting his own country is clearly an
extreme and bizarre position for his bizarrely held views, and both
are problematic for his neighbors and co-religionists.
Marion Dreyfus
Atlanta
|