|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University –
Summary of Neve Gordon’s (Dept of Political Science) anti-Israel
activity
One of the most bizarre aspects of this campus
war against the Jews is how numerous self-hating, anti-Semitic Jews
are in the ranks of the movement to achieve the annihilation of
Israel. For reasons that only a psychiatrist could fully understand,
these people use their birthright to give authenticity to the
campaign of delegitimizing and demonizing Israel. … Though he is an
Israeli citizen, Gordon invariably sides with Israel’s enemies in
the ongoing Mideast conflict. During the
siege of Ramallah in 2002, for instance, he barricaded himself
with
Yasser Arafat, the terrorist responsible for the deaths of more
Jews than any human being since Adolf Hitler. For years, Gordon has
been referring to Israel as a fascist, terrorist, “apartheid” state
that “resembles Nazi Germany.” He has posted numerous writings on
Holocaust-denial websites. And he has repeatedly advocated a “one
state” solution, in which Israel, by way of the so-called
Palestinian “right
of return” would be inundated with Arab “refugees” whose
inevitable political supremacy would spell the de facto end of
Israel.
http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/13/collaborators-in-the-campus-war-against-israel-and-the-jews-neve-gordon-by-john-perazzo/
Collaborators in the Campus War against Israel and the Jews: Neve
Gordon – by John Perazzo
Posted By John Perazzo in
FrontPage
October 13, 2009
The campus war against Israel and the
Jews is led by a group of anti-Semites, many of them faculty
members, who have made a career for themselves by traveling from one
university to another supporting Arab terrorism. They invariably
pretend that they are promoting peace. But in the Orwellian bubble
where they live, Arab aggression and terror become self-defense, and
Israeli self-defense becomes aggression and terror. Similarly,
Israeli democracy is apartheid, while Arab genocide is liberation.
One of the most bizarre aspects of this
campus war against the Jews is how numerous self-hating,
anti-Semitic Jews are in the ranks of the movement to achieve the
annihilation of Israel. For reasons that only a psychiatrist could
fully understand, these people use their birthright to give
authenticity to the campaign of delegitimizing and demonizing
Israel. Today the leading promoters of “divestment” and of
boycotting Israel are academic Jewish leftists, some of them from
Israel itself. In a few extreme cases, this detestation of Israel is
combined with a fawning courtship of Islamic terrorists, American
and European Neo-Nazis, and even Holocaust Deniers.
One of these anti-Semitic Jews is Dr.
Neve Gordon, chairman of the Department of Politics and Government
at Ben Gurion University (BGU) of the Negev. During the first
Palestinian Intifada (1987-1991), Gordon served as director of
Physicians for Human Rights – Israel, an organization that
consistently condemns Israeli military reprisals against Palestinian
terrorists while turning a blind eye to the homicidal atrocities
committed by the terrorists themselves. In 1999 Gordon earned a
Ph.D. from
Notre Dame University. Before joining the BGU faculty, he worked
variously as a visiting scholar at
UC Berkeley, the
University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, and the Watson Institute at
Brown University.
Though he is an Israeli citizen, Gordon
invariably sides with Israel’s enemies in the ongoing Mideast
conflict. During the
siege of Ramallah in 2002, for instance, he barricaded himself
with
Yasser Arafat, the terrorist responsible for the deaths of more
Jews than any human being since Adolf Hitler. For years, Gordon has
been referring to Israel as a fascist, terrorist, “apartheid” state
that “resembles Nazi Germany.” He has posted numerous writings on
Holocaust-denial websites. And he has repeatedly advocated a “one
state” solution, in which Israel, by way of the so-called
Palestinian “right
of return” would be inundated with Arab “refugees” whose
inevitable political supremacy would spell the de facto end of
Israel.
Recognizing that Israelis are highly
unlikely to ever agree to such an arrangement, Gordon
concedes that “the two-state solution is more realistic.” As
Gordon explains it, that option “entails Israel’s withdrawal to the
pre-1967 borders,… the division of Jerusalem, and a recognition of
the Palestinian right of return with the stipulation that only a
limited number of the 4.5 million Palestinian refugees would be
allowed to return to Israel.”
Gordon was formerly a regular columnist
for the
Hamas media apologist,
AlJazeera.com, where he regularly accused Israel of seeking to
sabotage the peace process and steal Arab lands. Last December, when
Hamas rockets and missiles were raining down on much of southern
Israel — some of them hitting the BGU campus — Gordon did not
denounce the Hamas terrorists. Instead he condemned the Israeli
military for “targeting” the building called “Gaza University,” a
structure used as a repository for the rockets intended to kill
Israelis.
In January 2009, when Israel was
engaged in its
Operation Cast Lead campaign to diminish the strength of Hamas
and put an end to the latter’s relentless rocket bombardment of
Israeli towns, Gordon
sneered at claims that the Israeli military was taking pains to
avoid inflicting civilian casualties:
“The fact
that the Israeli military could have razed the entire Gaza Strip,
but instead destroyed only 15% of the buildings does not make its
actions moral. The fact that the Israeli military could have killed
thousands of Palestinian children during this campaign, and, due to
restraint, killed ‘only’ 300, does not make Operation Cast Lead
ethical.
“Ultimately,
the moral claims the Israeli government uses to support its actions
during this war are empty. They actually reveal Israel’s
unwillingness to confront the original source of the current
violence, which is not Hamas, but rather the occupation of the Gaza
Strip, West Bank and East Jerusalem.”
Absent from Gordon’s condemnation of
the Israeli “occupation” is any mention of the way that occupation
came about in the first place. David Horowitz
explains:
“In 1967,
Egypt, Syria and Jordan attacked Israel for a second time and were
again defeated. It was in repelling these aggressors that Israel
came to control the West Bank and the Gaza strip, as well as the
oil-rich Sinai desert. Israel had every right to annex these
territories captured from the aggressors — a time-honored ritual
among nations, and in fact the precise way that Syria, Lebanon, Iraq
and Jordan had come into existence themselves. But Israel did not do
so. On the other hand, neither did it withdraw its armies or
relinquish its control.”
On August 26, 2009, the Los Angeles
Times published an opinion piece by Gordon titled “Boycott
Israel,” which depicted Israel as “an apartheid state” wherein
“[t]he Palestinians are stateless and lack many of the most basic
human rights.” “[T]he only way to counter the apartheid trend in
Israel,” said Gordon, “is through massive international pressure” in
the form of a boycott beginning with divestment from companies
operating in Judea and Samaria, and later moving on to firms that
“help sustain and reinforce the occupation.”
Before submitting the foregoing article
to the LA Times, Gordon gave his department at BGU advance
knowledge of what he intended to say in the piece, and offered to
step down as department chair if his colleagues thought his words
would prove too embarrassing to them. Yet those colleagues decided
unanimously not to let him step down; rather, they stood firmly
behind him.
Clearly, the Jewish collaborators in
the campus war against Israel are not waging their battle alone.
They enjoy a wealth of tactical and ideological support from their
fellow faculty members.
|