Ben Gurion University
Steve Plaut: Life in Israel is Stranger than Parody
Original article is
found here.
Karen
Russo, Sacramento Union Columnist
Published: March 27, 2008
For Dr. Steve Plaut, getting crazy, hysterical phone calls is
nothing new. By day, Plaut is a mild-mannered professor of economics
at the University of Haifa, but by night, he becomes one of Israel’s
most popular right-wing bloggers, a man with an uncanny ability to
upset people—especially those on the Left.
Plaut is the Director of ISRACAMPUS, a clone of the U.S.’s
“Campus Watch.” He also runs a personal blog, “Zionist Conspiracy,”
at
www.zioncon.blogspot.com.
Think of him as an Israeli version of Rush Limbaugh; Plaut is a
master at using outrageous humor to make his point.
The problem with his humor? Life in Israel is so strange that
it’s hard to concoct anything that’s so extreme, so obviously a
spoof, that at least some people won’t believe it to be true. That’s
when the phone calls start.
A few days ago, Plaut wrote a spoof press release about an
upcoming “pro-terror fest” to be held at the far-left University of
Haifa. In the fake announcement, Plaut said the university was
mourning the “untimely passing” of the Arab gunman who used his
Israeli ID papers to enter the Mercaz HaRav Yeshiva and murder eight
innocent students. His ridiculous advice – “Bring your own Hamas
flags” – should have signaled a joke, but not everyone got it.
“The University was inundated with outraged callers,” he said,
laughing hard. “Zionist students arranged a counter-protest.
Politicians called. Even Israel’s Chief Rabbi weighed in. It was
nuts.”
For Plaut, reality set in five years ago when he found himself in
a Kafka-esque quagmire that read like one of his spoofs. He ended up
facing the business end of a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public
Participation) lawsuit, facing allegations of libel. Odd, because
this time, the 55-year-old native of Philadelphia had written the
absolute truth about a Jewish Israeli neo-Nazi professor named Neve
Gordon.
The Man Behind the Blog
“My father escaped from Germany, and my grandparents were murdered
there. I have strong feelings about the Holocaust. So when I see
Israeli professors publishing vile anti-Semitic material, it’s too
much,” Plaut said. “So I’d been targeting the infamous Norman
Finkelstein, who in the beginning was a minor player spouting
ineffective neo-Nazi propaganda. But when Neve Gordon, an Israeli
professor, began supporting him and giving him credibility,
Finkelstein’s popularity soared. So I attacked Neve Gordon’s
political support for Finkelstein.”
A small column penned by Plaut in a now-defunct California
publication triggered the lawsuit.
“In 2001, Gordon illegally met master terrorist Yasser Arafat in
his PLO headquarters in Ramallah, and their pictures – smiling, in a
solidarity handshake – were published all over Israel,” he said. “I
wrote a piece – “Judenrat for Peace’ – pointing out that just like
during the Holocaust, the Judenrat assisted in the killing of their
fellow Jews, Gordon and his ilk were doing the same thing today. I
called Gordon a ‘Judenrat wannabe.’ I didn’t attack him
personally—attacked his politics.
Lawyered Up for Free Speech
“Gordon read it, hired an Arab lawyer – Fareed Ghanam – and sued me
for libel. That’s when the fun started.”
In a libel lawsuit, truth is a defense, so Plaut looked forward
to telling the truth about Neve Gordon. But problems cropped up when
Gordon went forum-shopping, looking for a court where his views
would find favor. He chose the Arab stronghold of Nazareth.
“It didn’t make sense,” Plaut said. “Gordon lives in Jerusalem,
he was teaching in Beersheba. I live in Haifa. And he sued me in
Nazareth?”
More trouble appeared when a female Arab judge was assigned,
Magistrate
Court Judge Reem Naddaf. How much trouble became clear when she
handed down her decision.
“It was unbelievable. The judge used her decision in the case to
attack Israel,” Plaut said. “First she ruled that all of Israel is
built on land stolen from other people, then she went on to justify
Holocaust revisionism. As judge, she wrote things even Neve Gordon
hadn’t said. Then she imposed a fine. Gordon hadn’t alleged any
financial losses, but Israeli law permits a libel award of 50,000
[Israeli Shekels]. She fined me [Israeli Shekels].”
The over-the-top decision attracted the outrage of Harvard
professor Alan Dershowitz.
“It is my opinion that Neve Gordon has gotten into bed with
neo-Nazis, Holocaust justice deniers, and anti-Semites,” Dershowitz
wrote in a Jerusalem Post column. “He is a despicable example of a
self-hating Jew and a self-hating Israeli.”
Then Dershowitz issued his own make-my-day challenge to Gordon:
“Sue me, too!” Gordon declined, calling Dershowitz’ challenge “a
cheap dare.”
Plaut appealed the adverse decision, and on March 3, the appeals
court ruling came down. In no uncertain terms, the three-judge
appeal panel rejected all of Gordon’s demands, and accepted
virtually all of Plaut’s.
One judge went even further. In his pleadings, Gordon had
asserted that Plaut called him a “Jew for Hitler” and a “Holocaust
denier.” Plaut claimed he had never said that, but Naddaf sided with
Gordon. This raised the hackles of Appellate Judge Abraham Abraham,
who not only criticized Judge Naddaf, but also went beyond, saying
that based on Gordon’s record, even if Plaut had said Gordon was a
“Jew for Hitler,” he would have been within his rights.
Plaut’s “free speech” victory in left-leaning Israel is
unparalleled.
“To beat Gordon in the Nazareth court was like beating him in PLO
headquarters, or beating Ahmadinejad in court in Teheran,” Plaut
said.
Even so, Plaut was hoping the case would go to Israel’s Supreme
Court.
“I wanted the Supreme Court of Israel to go on record as saying
that in Israel, free speech isn’t reserved just for anti-Semites,
for the far-left haters of Israel and for Arab politicians. I wanted
the Supreme Court to say that in Israel, you don’t have to be a
traitor to enjoy freedom of speech.”
|