|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University –
Neve Gordon (Dept of Political Science) praises Kobi Snitz’s “civil
disobedience” against the “annexation wall”; laments the
“non-lethal” options the Security Forces use to encourage civil
obedience
Kobi Snitz … is an Israeli anarchist who is currently serving a
20 day sentence for refusing to pay a 2,000 shekel fine.
Thirty-eight year-old Snitz was arrested with other activists in the
small Palestinian village of Kharbatha back in 2004 while trying to
prevent the demolition of the home of a prominent member of the
local popular committee. … Both the demonstrations and the attempt
to stop the demolition were acts of civil disobedience. … that once
a village decides to struggle against the annexation barrier the
entire community is punished. In addition to home demolitions,
curfews and other forms of movement restriction, the Israeli
military forces consistently uses violence against the
protestors--and most often targets the youth-- beating, tear-gassing
as well as deploying both lethal and “non-lethal” ammunition against
them.
On Palestinian Civil
Disobedience
By NEVE GORDON
September 28, 2009
Sometime in 1846, Henry David Thoreau
spent a night in jail because he refused to pay his taxes. This was
his way of opposing the Mexican-American War as well as the
institution of slavery. A few years later he published the essay
Civil Disobedience, which has since been read by millions of people,
including many Israelis and Palestinians.
Kobi Snitz read the book. He is an Israeli anarchist who is
currently serving a 20 day sentence for refusing to pay a 2,000
shekel fine.
Thirty-eight year-old Snitz was arrested with other activists in
the small Palestinian village of Kharbatha back in 2004 while trying
to prevent the demolition of the home of a prominent member of the
local popular committee. The demolition, so it seems, was carried
out both to intimidate and punish the local leader who had, just a
couple of weeks earlier, began organizing weekly demonstrations
against the annexation wall. Both the demonstrations and the attempt
to stop the demolition were acts of civil disobedience.
In a letter sent to friends the night before his incarceration,
Snitz writes that “I and the others who were arrested with me are
guilty of nothing except not doing more to oppose the state’s truly
criminal policies.” Snitz also explains that paying the fine is an
acknowledgment of guilt which he finds demeaning. Finally, he
concludes his epistle by insisting that his punishment is trivial
when compared to the punishment meted out to Palestinian teenagers
who have resisted the occupation. These thirteen, fourteen, fifteen
and sixteen year olds, he claims, are often detained for 20 days
before the legal process even begins.
Snitz is not exaggerating.
In a recent report, the Palestinian human rights organizations
Stop the Wall and Addameer document the forms of repression Israel
has deployed against villages that have resisted the annexation of
their land. The two rights groups show that once a village decides
to struggle against the annexation barrier the entire community is
punished. In addition to home demolitions, curfews and other forms
of movement restriction, the Israeli military forces consistently
uses violence against the protestors--and most often targets the
youth-- beating, tear-gassing as well as deploying both lethal and
“non-lethal” ammunition against them.
Since 2004, nineteen people, about half of them children, have
been killed in protests against the barrier. The rights groups found
that in four small Palestinian villages -- Bil’in, Ni’lin, Ma’sara
and Jayyous -- 1,566 Palestinians have been injured in
demonstrations against the wall. In five villages alone, 176
Palestinians have been arrested for protesting against the
annexation, with children and youth specifically targeted during
these arrest campaigns. The actual numbers of those who were injured
and arrested are no doubt greater considering that these are just
the incidents that took place in a few villages.
Each number has a name and a story. Consider, for example, the
arrest of sixteen year-old Mohammed Amar Hussan Nofal who was
detained along with about 65 other people from his village Jayyous
on February 18, 2009. According to his testimony, he was initially
interrogated for two and a half hours in the village school.
“They asked me why I pa
|