|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Ben Gurion University
Ben
Gurion University Prez Carmi cites Gordon's claim that Israel is an
"apartheid" regime, but never gets around to pointing out that it is
NOT
However, I strongly believe a call for a
worldwide boycott of Israel written by a Ben-Gurion University
faculty member, Neve Gordon, that appeared in The Times oversteps
the boundaries of academic freedom -- because it has nothing to do
with it. Academic freedom exists to ensure that there is an
unfettered and free discussion of ideas relating to research and
teaching and to provide a forum for the debate of complicated ideas
that may challenge accepted norms. Gordon, however, used his pulpit
as a university faculty member to advocate a personal opinion, which
is really demagoguery cloaked in academic theory. Gordon argues that
Israel is an "apartheid" state and that "a boycott would save Israel
from itself." But the empirical facts show that it would destroy the
very fabric of the society that he claims to want to protect. … At
the same time, by calling on other entities, including academic
institutions, to boycott Israel -- and effectively, to boycott his
own university -- Gordon has forfeited his ability to work
effectively within the academic setting, with his colleagues in
Israel and around the world. After his very public, personal
soul-searching in his Op-Ed article, leading to his extreme
description of Israel as an "apartheid" state, how can he, in good
faith, create the collaborative atmosphere necessary for true
academic research and teaching?
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-carmi1-2009sep01,0,1196867.story
Neve Gordon's divisive Op-Ed
Ben-Gurion University's president responds to one of her professor's
call for a boycott of Israel.
By Rivka Carmi
September 1, 2009
As president of Ben-Gurion University of the
Negev, I have always remained open and impartial to the wide
diversity of opinions within our academic faculty and their right to
free speech, no matter how controversial their views or writings may
be.
However, I strongly believe a call for a
worldwide boycott of Israel written by a Ben-Gurion University
faculty member, Neve Gordon, that appeared in The Times oversteps
the boundaries of academic freedom -- because it has nothing to do
with it.
Academic freedom exists to ensure that there is
an unfettered and free discussion of ideas relating to research and
teaching and to provide a forum for the debate of complicated ideas
that may challenge accepted norms. Gordon, however, used his pulpit
as a university faculty member to advocate a personal opinion, which
is really demagoguery cloaked in academic theory.
Gordon argues that Israel is an "apartheid"
state and that "a boycott would save Israel from itself." But the
empirical facts show that it would destroy the very fabric of the
society that he claims to want to protect. Instead of investing in
activities that promote coexistence, this "call for a boycott" is
already being used to isolate Israel.
This is particularly pernicious for our
university, a proudly Zionist institution that embodies the dream of
Israel's first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, to bring
development and prosperity to all the residents of the Negev region.
This work -- which includes community outreach and scientific
innovation in Israel and around the world carried out by nearly
25,000 students, faculty and staff -- is being threatened by the
egregious remarks of one person, under the guise of academic
freedom.
A number of online campaigns have been launched
calling for donors and other supporters of the university to
"boycott BGU." We have heard the calls by those who demand that the
university ignore Israeli law and fire Gordon, a tenured faculty
member, on the basis of his statements. And we are also under attack
by others who champion Gordon on the basis of freedom of speech.
Like it or not, Gordon cannot be readily
dismissed. The law in Israel is very clear, and the university is a
law-abiding institution.
At the same time, by calling on other entities,
including academic institutions, to boycott Israel -- and
effectively, to boycott his own university -- Gordon has forfeited
his ability to work effectively within the academic setting, with
his colleagues in Israel and around the world. After his very
public, personal soul-searching in his Op-Ed article, leading to his
extreme description of Israel as an "apartheid" state, how can he,
in good faith, create the collaborative atmosphere necessary for
true academic research and teaching?
The primary effect of Gordon's Israel-bashing
will be to detract from the work of his university. I am a doctor;
my professional career has focused on preventing hereditary genetic
diseases in the Bedouin Arab community. Today, the laboratory that I
founded at Ben-Gurion University is working with Bedouin,
Palestinian and Jordanian doctors and researchers to improve the
health of Arab chil
|