Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University – a Rankled Reader calls out BGU
President Rivka Carmi's "Elitist Misjudgment"; corrects the Left's
mis-definition of McCarthyism
This letter is in response to your interview
with the Jerusalem Post of August 21 under the inappropriate heading
"McCarthy
vs Voltaire in Beersheba". Inappropriate, because the brouhaha
about the abuse of academic freedom in Israeli universities bears no
resemblance whatsoever to McCarthyism which is defined in The
American Heritage Dictionary as "The practice of publicizing
accusations of political disloyalty or subversion with insufficient
regard to evidence". …
In the circumstances, I am particularly
disturbed by your statement that you did not intend to respond to Im
Tirtzu's letter as you considered that it didn't deserve the dignity
of a response. In all seriousness I ask you to reconsider this
elitist misjudgment. Neither the public, nor the Knesset, nor the
Council for Higher Education consider it undignified to respond to
them.
A lightly edited version appeared in the Jerusalem Post Opinion
section (25/8/2010) as well
-----Original Message-----
From: Maurice Ostroff
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:03:55
To: <president@bgu.ac.il>;
<nperlis@bgu.ac.il>
Subject: Mccarthy and Voltaire
Maurice Ostroff
5/501 Asher Barash, Herzliya, 46365 ISRAEL
Tel. +972 9 9595 261
Fax. +972 9 9509 667
http://www.2nd-thoughts.org/
An open letter to Professor Carmi
Dear Professor Carmi,
It is with great respect that I address this
letter to you, in view of your achievements as a geneticist, your
work among Israel's Bedouin population and your position as the
first woman president of an Israeli university. And it is with great
sadness that I view the public dispute between you and the Im Tirtzu
group as I respect the sincerity and idealism of both sides.
This letter is in response to your interview
with the Jerusalem Post of August 21 under the inappropriate heading
"McCarthy
vs Voltaire in Beersheba". Inappropriate, because the brouhaha
about the abuse of academic freedom in Israeli universities bears no
resemblance whatsoever to McCarthyism which is defined in The
American Heritage Dictionary as "The practice of publicizing
accusations of political disloyalty or subversion with insufficient
regard to evidence".
In fact, the presentation of factual evidence
by concerned citizens about the activities of academics who advocate
sanctions against their own universities is the diametric opposite
of McCarthyism. These concerns are expressed not only by Im Tirtzu
but also by other organizations and large numbers of university
faculty members, students and the public. While I am not in complete
agreement with all of Im Tirtzu's actions, their efforts to bring
truthful information about the disloyal behavior of some academics
to the notice of donors and the general public, is to be highly
commended. You must agree that publicizing truthful facts is an
essential right if not a duty in a democratic society.
After all they are expressing much the same
thoughts that you expressed in an op-ed to the LA Times when you
wrote that you strongly believe a call for a worldwide boycott of
Israel written by a Ben-Gurion University faculty member, Neve
Gordon, that appeared in The Times
oversteps the boundaries of academic freedom.
And more to the point when you went even
further in a letter in Hebrew that you sent to BGU faculty in which
you implied that Prof. Gordon's words
may even amount to treason.
In the circumstances, I am particularly
disturbed by your statement that you did not intend to respond to Im
Tirtzu's letter as you considered that it didn't deserve the dignity
of a response. In all seriousness I ask you to reconsider this
elitist misjudgment. Neither the public, nor the Knesset, nor the
Council for Higher Education consider it undignified to respond to
them.
More importantly, your rejection of complaints
about activities of an academic, that you yourself have described as
bordering on treason, contradicts your statement during the
Jerusalem Post interview that you consider it important that
students be critical and express their opinions and that critical
thought is a cornerstone of academic scholarship.
Very significantly, you said during the
interview that there are people who do and say things that you
abhor, but like Voltaire, you will defend to the death their right
to say it. If this statement of yours is to have any meaning at all,
then surely you should defend the rights of Im Tirtzu, Israel
Academia Monitor, Isracampus and concerned members of your own board
of governors like Michael Gross, to express their sincere deep
concerns.
This letter will be publicized as will the
reply I hope to receive from you.
Sincerely,
Maurice Ostroff
|