Editorial Article
Tel Aviv University - The Terrorist-Financed NGO
Gisha run
by Tel Aviv U. Law Professors Kenneth Mann and Sari Bashi
Lee Kaplan,
www.IsraCampus.Org.il
3/7/2009
“It
is not desirable to cultivate a respect for law, so much as a
respect for right.” - Henry David Thoreau
If you want to get to know Tel Aviv University
Law Professors Kenneth Mann and Sari Bashi, you need also to discuss
the NGO,
Gisha, which they founded and for which they list themselves
as legal counsels. As leaders of Gisha, Mann and Bashi are
two of the many lawyers in Israel who are working diligently to
death and hasten realization of the goals and political agenda of
the Palestinian Arabs. In particular, this is manifested in their
latest work opposing the Jewish state’s security procedures in Gaza,
better known as Hamastan.
Until very recently
on leave from Tel Aviv University’s Law School in order to serve
as Israel's first Chief Public Defender, Professor Kenneth Mann has
also held the positions of distinguished visiting professor at
Rutgers Law School and was a senior research associate at Yale Law
School. At TAU he has taught criminal procedure, evidence, trial
practice, and supervised a legal-aid clinic in criminal law. Part of
Mann’s ideological commitment to aid the “Palestinians” may have
been gleaned at the University of California at Berkeley, where he
earned his BA and, then an M.A. from the Center for the Study of Law
and Society at UC Berkeley. He earned his J.D. from Berkeley’s
Boalt Law School which includes quite a few radical and
anti-Israel faculty members. Sari Bashi is an American-Israeli
attorney who teaches currently at TAU’s law school and graduated
from Yale Law School in 2006. She co-founded Gisha with Mann
shortly after her graduation.
Gisha’s mission, according to Mann and
Bashi, is as a legal NGO whose purpose is
"litigation and advocacy that aim to help individuals exercise their
right to freedom of movement while working for systemic change in
military practices and abuses at Israeli border-crossings and
checkpoints…exploiting
"untapped potential for law reform effectuated through intensive
engagement with the military bureaucracy." It has an emphasis on
"the Gaza Strip, a severely underserved area whose viability depends
on the ability of people and goods to move in and out of its
borders." Prior to founding Gisha, while in Israel under a
Fellowship grant,
Sari Bashi worked at the
Association for Civil Rights in Israel, a leftist anti-Israel
NGO masquerading as a “human rights organization.” ACRI has even
programs to encourage IDF soldiers to desert or refuse to serve.
Mann now serves as Gisha’s Legal Adviser and Chairperson of its
Advisory Committee.
Gisha uses
the Israeli courts to sue the Jewish state for taking security
measures. Mann and Bashi feel that the same 1.5 million Arabs
who elected and cheer on Hamas and Fatah terrorism are victims of
“collective punishment” by the Israeli government, and suffer under
“restricted movement.”
The alternative to such “collective punishment”
is to sit back passively while thousands of rockets are fired at
Israeli civilians. Israel needs to control the Gaza borders and
entry points and has a right to do so under international law.
Israel deported 8,000 Jews before it left Gaza as a price paid for
peace, and what it received in return was Islamofascist terror. Mann
and Bashi evidently blame Israel for all that and have filed suit
against the Israeli government over security micro-procedures. In
other words, people with expertise in law think they have the right
to second-guess the military’s own leadership on questions of how to
fight terror.
Gisha receives the majority of its funding from
Echoing Green, another NGO that also funds such openly
pro-terror groups as the
International Solidarity Movement. As an indication of their
bias, Echoing Green named ISM co-founders and leaders Adam
Shapiro and Huwaida Arraf (both of whom have admitted they
consider suicide bombings “legitimate resistance” and the latter
has
openly admitted she works with Hamas, PFLP and Palestinian Islamic
Jihad) as among the ten best “social
entrepreneurs of the year,” and awarded them a $90,000 grant.
Arraf only yesterday was arrested at sea by the IDF Navy while
trying to smuggle goods into Gaza for Hamas and to open up a
sea-borne weapons smuggling route for Iran. This was Arraf’s seventh
voyage and she even received a medal from Hamas for her efforts.
Gisha and Sari Bashi received
over one million dollars from Echoing Green for Gisha’s
project to ease the “movement” of Palestinians, “movement” that so
often facilitates terrorist atrocities. Meanwhile.
Echoing Green, the source for Gisha’s funding, gets money from Saudi
Arabia.
Kenneth Mann
gave a law lecture on “Israeli apartheid” for the venomously
anti-Israel Alternative Information Center, itself with close
ties to the ISM and “anarchist” groups. Bashi obsessively
uses the words “apartheid” and “collective punishment” in
describing Israeli security procedures. Gisha makes little
attempt to hide its political agenda and bias. In an interview with
the Jerusalem Post ("One
on One: 'Control Creates Responsibility'", Feb. 6, 2008),
Gisha Director Bashi, called Israel’s Gaza policy "illegal,
dangerous and stupid." Bashi was sharply challenged by Avraham
Bell's January 2008 article (International
Law and Gaza: The Assault on Israel's Right to Self-Defense,
Jan. 2008). In response, Bashi simply repeated standard one-sided
claims without providing a serious legal analysis regarding the
historical status of Gaza.
Gisha has a highly selective interest in
applying international law to the Middle East conflict. On March 2,
Gisha issued a
statement that called on “both sides of the conflict” to “remove
civilians from the cycle of combat.” How nice, except there is no
“cycle of conflict” and only the Palestinians cynically use
civilians as political pawns to get media points. While noting that
“the Hamas organization and militants in Gaza must immediately stop
the firing of rockets on towns in southern Israel”, Gisha
drew a parallel between these attacks and Israel’s response,
condemning Israel's “undifferentiated firing into crowded population
centers.” Gisha did not condemn Hamas’ practice of
launching rockets from within civilians areas (behind human
shields), a practice that is clearly a violation of international
law.
Mann frequently drifts into anti-Israel ranting. According to Mann,
“The Israeli government's definition of a ‘humanitarian crisis’
would require human deaths. Now, there have been deaths -- among the
chronically ill, who were not permitted to leave the Gaza Strip for
medical care that is not available (or no longer available) there,
due to the closure. There have been deaths among those who are
trying to bring the necessities of daily life in through the
tunnels. And, of course, there were many deaths during Operation
Cast Lead -- including an unusual spike in maternal and neo-natal
deaths due to lack of care, as the UN has reported. It is not as if
nobody knew. Many experts have stated that this policy of collective
punishment against an entire civilian population under a belligerent
military occupation is illegal under international law.”
A humanitarian crisis among the Palestinians
actually consists of a situation in which the terrorists do not
having any foreign aid money to steal. Meanwhile Mann laments as
part of his “humanitarian crisis” the deaths among those “who are
trying to bring the necessities of daily life through the tunnels.”
The necessities of life these people bring in are explosives and
rocket components. If Mann wants his Palestinians to have easy
access to civilian supplies, maybe he should get them to stop
shooting rockets and release Gilad Shalit.
For Gisha and its lawyers a one million
dollar grant must help alleviate any potential guilt pangs about
their serving as apologists for the misbehavior of Palestinians.
Sari Bashi mentions that her family in Israel used to yell at her
over for what she does, but now they just avoid the subject and
invite her over for family gatherings. It would be interesting to
learn what they will say about her funding coming indirectly from
Saudi Arabia and from groups that want the end of the Jewish state
and to excuse the murder of Israelis as “legitimate
resistance.”
It’s troubling to think that the next
generation of Israeli lawyers responsible for litigating in arenas
of international law are being taught by such radicals.
========================================
Op-Ed articles appearing on IsraCampus.Org.il are those of the writer and
do not necessarily represent the opinion of IsraCampus.Org.il
|