Hebrew University
Hebrew University - Far Leftist Alon Harel (School of Law) Insists
that Transparency Laws are in fact a War against Law and Order
You
know, in contrast with a "Palestinian Right of Return"
The new legislation
harms not only or mainly the rule of law, but law itself - the law
of a country, as distinct from power that depends on brute force.
Theoreticians of jurisprudence have pondered at length the
difference between a robber who takes money at gunpoint and a tax
official who has the police, prisons and legal system behind him.
These thinkers say the law, unlike a robber's threats, is an
expression of a political entity's collective will, and obedience to
the law typically expresses the desire or obligation to be part of
the political community.
...
The Knesset has
declared war not only or mainly on these NGOs, and not even on the
rule of law, but on law itself. The legislature has chosen to use
law not as a tool to realize policy, but to tyrannize the people.
The logic guiding this behavior is not that of a tax collector, but
of a robber. "I'm stronger so I'm taking your money." The death of
law and its substitution by force should make human rights groups
think twice about the way they conduct themselves in the future.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/the-death-of-law-in-israel-1.397385
The death of law in Israel
The Knesset has declared war not only or mainly on these NGOs,
and not even on the rule of law, but on law itself.
By Alon Harel
Published 24.11.11
The Knesset is at work on a variety of bills
whose declared purpose is to hit at leftist NGOs, paralyze the
courts and ensure - through legislation that criminalizes people and
makes them pay damages - that the public discourse will be more
Zionist, right wing and convenient for the authorities. Many people
perceive these bills as a fatal blow against the rule of law.
The rule of law, they argue, is based on free
public discourse, an independent judiciary and the protection of
basic rights. Nothing, they say, can be further from free and
democratic public discourse than the new legislation the Knesset is
working on with energy and devotion that is entirely
uncharacteristic of its efforts in other realms - social justice and
economic growth, for example.
This argument is mistaken and misleading. The
new legislation harms not only or mainly the rule of law, but law
itself - the law of a country, as distinct from power that depends
on brute force. Theoreticians of jurisprudence have pondered at
length the difference between a robber who takes money at gunpoint
and a tax official who has the police, prisons and legal system
behind him. These thinkers say the law, unlike a robber's threats,
is an expression of a political entity's collective will, and
obedience to the law typically expresses the desire or obligation to
be part of the political community.
The state demands obedience not because it is
strong, but because it is right. And even when it is not right,
citizens are called on not only to obey the law, but to respect it.
The law is not only a prohibition behind which stand the police,
courts and gallows; breaking it violates our mutual social and
political obligations as citizens of a lawful state.
Of course, not everyone shares these
sentiments. And even those who share them might violate them
sometimes whether for convenience or ideology. But even criminals
might harshly criticize violations of the law by others and regret
their own violations.
When respect for the law is absent, the law
stops functioning as law and becomes force. People might continue to
obey it, but the obedience is fragile. Just like when a robber puts
down his gun for a moment and the victim may be expected to run for
his life, the citizen who sees the police officer and the judge as
enemies and not partners will flee when he can and break the law.
So far, Israeli human rights groups have
strictly observed the law and fought by legal means against what
they perceive as injustices. The NGOs at the core of the debate have
registered as nonprofit associations, revealed their records to the
registrar of nonprofit associations, faithfully reported every
donation and represented their positions in the courts.
The Knesset has declared war not only or mainly
on these NGOs, and not even on the rule of law, but on law itself.
The legislature has chosen to use law not as a tool to realize
policy, but to tyrannize the people. The logic guiding this behavior
is not that of a tax collector, but of a robber. "I'm stronger so
I'm taking your money." The death of law and its substitution by
force should make human rights groups think twice about the way they
conduct themselves in the future.
The writer is a law professor at the Hebrew
University of Jerusalem.
|