Hebrew University
Hebrew University - "Mandel Scholar" Amos Goldberg
battles Zionism
Every week, violent thugs, hooligans and terrorists attack Israeli police
and soldiers as part of the “protest” against Israel defending its
children from genocidal terrorists. The "protesters" hold these
violent confrontations at the West Bank villages of Bil’in and
Na’alin. They are the initiative of violent anti-Israel extremist
groups financed by the New Israel Fund. The rioters include
“anarchists” and members of the pro-Hamas Ta’ayush group.
Today in Haaretz, one of the leaders in this group, one Amos Goldberg,
writes a mind-numbing Op-Ed article denouncing people who criticize
those violent thugs or who challenge the right of hostile forces
outside of Israel to fund treasonous groups inside of Israel.
Goldberg’s entire diatribe follows below. In it, Goldberg claims
Israel is warring against “human rights activists.” The truth is
that his “human rights activists” are pro-jihad terrorists. Of
course what REALLY has him upset is the beginning of understanding
among Israelis that groups like his are being propped up, in spite
of having almost no support within Israel, by belligerent groups
outside of Israel, including the New Israel Fund. Violent
hooliganism is “peaceful protest,” insists Goldberg.
Goldberg has a long track record of churning out anti-Israel propaganda.
Naturally he has also been involved in those protests in Jerusalem
demanding that the Simon the Righteous neighborhood be kept
judenrein. He insists that Israel is an evil Goliath oppressing the
poor Palestinian David (http://www.mg.co.za/article/2008-07-20-david-and-goliath-revisited).
He has been arrested for his hooliganism (http://www.isracampus.org.il/third%20level%20pages/HebrewU%20-%20lecturers%20get%20arrested.htm).
He is active in promoting the Palestinian “right of return,” meaning
their right to destroy Israel (see
http://www.isracampus.org.il/third%20level%20pages/Petitions%20-%20Academics%20who%20support%20right%20of%20return.htm),
and also signs petitions calling for world boycotts against Israel.
Goldberg is a “Mandel Scholar” at the Scholion Research Center in Jewish
Studies at the Hebrew University. The Center is largely financed by
the Mandel Foundation in Cleveland. Mr. Morton L. Mandel – Chairman
& CEO Mandel Foundation, chairs the Scholion Center. My guess is
that he and the Mandel Foundation folks do not know what kind of
people they are hosting and funding as “scholars.” If you would like
to let them know, their contact information appears here:
http://www.mandelfoundation.org/MandelFoundation/Contact.htm
Goldberg here proudly proclaims his membership in
the anti-Israel extremist group “Ta’ayush.” Neve Gordon, another
leader in Ta’ayush, once proudly described that group as seditious.
He meant that as a compliment. NGO Monitor exposes the group here:
http://www.ngo-monitor.org/article/ta_ayush
Ta’ayush promotes boycotts and divestment against Israel.
Here is the entire Goldberg article:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1158057.html
Israel wants to push
Palestinians back into cycle of violence
By Amos Goldberg
22/03/2010
Israel has
been waging a bitter battle in recent months against human rights
activists and the non-violent struggle by Jews and Arabs against the
occupation. To this end, the state has made use of the most
questionable means available to it.
They are
attacking on all fronts, and it is hard to believe that their
actions do not represent official policy. As such, without the
citizens noticing it, Israeli democracy is once again heading in the
direction of the "democracies" of Russia and Egypt.
It began
with harassment and unwarranted arrests of the leaders of the Bil'in
and Na'alin demonstrations. When these did not have their desired
effect, the army declared the area of the villages a closed military
zone on Fridays.
For the next
six months, whoever goes to these areas in order to demonstrate will
immediately be charged with entering a closed military zone and will
be brought to trial.
Designating
a closed military zone is a draconian legal measure that limits
basic human rights and is meant to prevent security risks, not
protest. Of course, the army has never adopted a like tactic to
prevent, for example, the rebuilding of illegal outposts after they
have been razed. Only the protests of the left and the Palestinians
are allowed to be prevented without any limits.
The
harassment and the arrests made by the army and the Shin Bet may
have failed to break the protests at Bil'in and Na'alin, but they
worked in Jerusalem. During the past few years the police have
managed to crack down on quiet civil protests in Silwan using these
methods. They are now using similar policies in the neighborhood of
Sheikh Jarrah.
The settlers
there, who are immune, use violence against the residents,
especially women and children. The residents turn to the police,
which take their time in arriving and do not arrest anyone.
After the
Arabs lose their patience, one of them responds with a shove, is
immediately arrested for aggravated assault and is brought to trial
only after a lengthy waiting period in custody. Sometimes charges of
aggravated sexual harassment are brought against residents for
nothing more than using strong language. This is happening here and
now.
The same
method is being implemented by the security forces in Hebron and in
the southern Hebron Hills. One of the activists in the struggle for
grazing areas for the Bedouin, who have been stripped innumerable
times of their lands by the army and the settlers, was charged with
cutting a wildflower and has been held for a week. Children and
adults, mostly from families linked to groups like B'tselem, are
arrested on a near daily basis on false accusations.
The
effectiveness of these measures is enormous because in addition to
the fear element, the process is so expensive (hiring an attorney,
posting bail, etc.) that the activists are unable to meet the costs,
even if the legal process does result in the release of those who
have been arrested.
At the same
time, the state is waging a campaign against human rights groups.
Not only does it send its senior officials to European capitals to
convince the governments there to prevent funding for these
organizations, but in recent days the Justice Ministry has begun
working on legislation that will make funding these organizations
with foreign donations nearly impossible.
This is the
look of the only democracy in the Middle East - one that cannot
suffer even non-violent protests by Jews and Palestinians, or the
activity of human rights groups, Jewish or Arab, that expose its
true colors.
Beyond the
issue of democracy, are we to understand that the state is
destroying the channels of peaceful protest in order to push the
Palestinians back into a cycle of violence? This would then allow it
to go back to wrapping itself up in self-righteousness and argue
that it is combating terrorism. After all, this is what it considers
to be its forte.
The writer is a
fellow at Scholion Research Center at Hebrew University and an
activist in Ta'ayus - Arab-Jewish Partnership.
|