Site Index

 

Home

 

About IsraCampus

 

Search

 

עברית

 

Русский

 

Israeli Campuses

 

   Ben Gurion U

   Hebrew U

   Tel Aviv U

   U of Haifa

   Other Schools

 

Gallery of Rogues

    A-C

    D-G

    H-K

    L-N

    O-R

    S-V

    W-Z

 

Israeli Academic Extremism

 

Israeli Academic Extremists outside Israel

 

Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli Academics

 

ALEF Watch

 

IDI Watch

 

IsraCampus Essays

 

How to Complain

 

Contact Us

 

Israel Democracy Institute (IDI) Watch

IDI Watch - IDI and researcher Anat Roth can’t let go of the Gaza disengagement; claims reporting on the disengagement belongs to IDI

The Israel Democracy Institute and one of its researchers, Anat Roth, are suing attorney Michael Sfard and Col (res.) Shaul Arieli, two well-known left-wing activists, for copyright violation. … This material included "substantial sections" of Roth's 2005 study of settler campaigns against the fence and the disengagement from the Gaza Strip, including "exclusive, unique interviews" that she conducted with settler leaders over many months.

www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1106957.html

Top left-wing activists face lawsuit for plagiarism

By Maya Sela, Haaretz Correspondent
12/08/2009

The Israel Democracy Institute and one of its researchers, Anat Roth, are suing attorney Michael Sfard and Col (res.) Shaul Arieli, two well-known left-wing activists, for copyright violation.

The suit, filed in the Tel Aviv District Court, states that in their book about the separation fence, "Homa u'Mehdal, Geder Hahafrada - Bitahon or Hamdanut" ("Wall and Failure, the Separation Fence - Security or Greed"), Sfard and Arieli plagiarized material written and edited by the plaintiffs without seeking permission or even properly crediting the author.

This material included "substantial sections" of Roth's 2005 study of settler campaigns against the fence and the disengagement from the Gaza Strip, including "exclusive, unique interviews" that she conducted with settler leaders over many months.

Upon discovering this, Roth and the IDI demanded that Sfard, Arieli and their publishers - two divisions of Yedioth Ahronoth Books, which were also named as respondents - halt sales of the book, remove unsold books from stores and publish an apology in the press.

Not only did the respondents refuse, they are still printing and selling the book, and even planning to translate it into several foreign languages, the suit said.

The suit seeks damages of NIS 300,000.