Israeli Academic Extremism
Isi Leibler, past VP of World
Jewish Congress and Jerusalem Post columnist, recognizes the danger
in Leftist NGOs
Some of these NGOs are also directly
responsible for the demonization of the IDF, which takes
extraordinary measures to minimize civilian casualties in a manner
unmatched by any other military force.
They succeeded in slandering soldiers
as inhuman monsters and war criminals deliberately killing innocent
civilians, and laid the foundations for the lies and distortions
upon which the Goldstone commission findings were based. This also
led to calls to try our soldiers as war criminals at the
International Criminal Court.
What made these NGOs so effective were
the enormous funds at their disposal. Much of this money originates
from European governments and elements hostile to Israel exploiting
these organizations as vehicles to blatantly interfere in the
internal affairs of our country and undermine our global standing.
There is thus every reason to expose the
sources of these funds, both to highlight the unethical activities
of the governments concerned and to enable Israelis to appreciate
that many of these NGOs, acting under the guise of human rights
advocacy, are in reality promoting a very different agenda, funded
by foreign political groups seeking to delegitimize the Jewish state
http://wordfromjerusalem.com/?p=2760
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=203317
Yes to prosecuting subversion, no to
McCarthyism
What is intended as an exercise to expose the foreign funding of
NGOs indulging in anti-Israel activity will divide the nation, will
be perceived as a right-wing government muzzling freedom of
expression.
By ISI LEIBLER
13/01/2011
Even though empathizing with the anger and
frustration of many in the face of the blatantly anti-Israeli
activities of certain Israeli NGOs operating under the guise of
human rights groups, I oppose the establishment of the Knesset
committee to probe their funding. I do so recognizing that some of
these bodies are indulging in activities which, in the context of a
country under siege and effectively at war, border on or actually
amount to subversion or even treason – a politically incorrect term
that since the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin has been deleted from
our political lexicon.
We largely have ourselves to blame for enabling
our adversaries to succeed in embedding their false narrative into
the consciousness of the world. Today, in contrast to our early
years when we were portrayed as the plucky David warding off the
evil Goliath, we are at the brunt of a globally orchestrated
campaign to demonize and delegitimize us by depicting us as
colonialists, occupiers, racists and fascists.
Our failure has been augmented by the small but
influential far Left post-Zionist factions which systematically
promote the Arab narrative and distort our position in our own media
and universities. The newspaper Haaretz has a tiny
circulation, but its English Internet edition has emerged as the
most effective ingredient in the campaign by our enemies to portray
us as villains. It is quoted extensively by the global media, and
employed as a primary source by foreign ministries throughout the
world.
In recent years, these domestic anti- Israeli
forces have been augmented by flourishing local NGOs whose primary
objective seems to be to depict us as racist warmongers.
There should be no misunderstanding. A genuine
democracy must encourage the presence of organizations committed to
exposing wrongdoing, and we can take pride in the legitimate bodies
engaged in such activities. They are, however, a far cry from those
NGOs libeling and defaming the Jewish state and thus paving the way
for global boycott, sanctions and divestment initiatives.
Some of these NGOs are also directly
responsible for the demonization of the IDF, which takes
extraordinary measures to minimize civilian casualties in a manner
unmatched by any other military force.
They succeeded in slandering soldiers as
inhuman monsters and war criminals deliberately killing innocent
civilians, and laid the foundations for the lies and distortions
upon which the Goldstone commission
findings were based. This also led to calls to try our soldiers as
war criminals at the International Criminal Court.
What made these NGOs so effective were the
enormous funds at their disposal. Much of this money originates from
European governments and elements hostile to Israel exploiting these
organizations as vehicles to blatantly interfere in the internal
affairs of our country and undermine our global standing.
There is thus every reason to expose the
sources of these funds, both to highlight the unethical activities
of the governments concerned and to enable Israelis to appreciate
that many of these NGOs, acting under the guise of human rights
advocacy, are in reality promoting a very different agenda, funded
by foreign political groups seeking to delegitimize the Jewish
state.
But here there is a caveat.
AFTER ATTORNEY-GENERAL Yehuda Weinstein
declined to investigate the activities of these groups, Israel
Beiteinu initiated legislation to investigate the sources of their
funding.
My concern is that now that the Knesset has
belatedly decided to deal with this issue, it is doing so in a
boorish manner. What is intended as an exercise to expose the
foreign origins of the funding of local NGOs indulging in
anti-Israeli activity will divide the nation and is likely to be
widely perceived as a right-wing government seeking to muzzle
freedom of expression. It may in fact transform these groups into
martyrs without effectively inhibiting them.
The term McCarthyism
is continuously being abused by anti-Israeli groups seeking to
prevent exposure of their activities. However, we should bear in
mind that Sen. Joseph McCarthy's accusations against communist
influence and infiltration were fully substantiated after his death.
It was the methods he employed and the indiscriminate manner by
which he labeled organizations and individuals that rightfully
discredited him. In the long term, his campaign proved to be utterly
counterproductive, and created considerable sympathy and cover for
elements that really were engaged in subversive activities.
I fear that the same may also happen in this
instance.
Yet clearly there is a need for transparency,
and there is nothing like sunlight to expose groups involved in
anti-Israeli activity while purporting to act as human rights
activists.
What we need are not parliamentary
investigative committees whose conclusions will be tainted as being
politically motivated, but balanced legislation which will enable
and oblige the state to prosecute elements engaged in subversion.
Laws concerning contributions to NGOs should
not be selective, and should require all organizations – from the
Right as well as the Left – to be transparent about the sources of
their funding. Legitimate NGOs have nothing to hide, and such
legislation would obviate the need to single out organizations in
advance. As it is, nonprofit bodies are already technically obliged
to reveal any contribution in excess of $20,000 and declare its
purpose.
Likewise, public dissemination of information
concerning the IDF which is proven subsequently to have been false,
knowingly and maliciously disseminated for the purpose of demonizing
or delegitimizing Israel, should represent grounds for prosecution
or sanction. An example would be those who deliberately disseminated
false tales of the IDF committing war crimes, which paved the way
for the Goldstone libel.
Likewise, those calling on youngsters to evade
the draft on political grounds, whether from the far Left or far
Right, must be held accountable.
It also goes without saying that NGOs engaged
in global campaigns to boycott or divest from Israel should be
investigated and prosecuted.
If legislation obliging the state to act
against such behavior were to be instituted, the objectives of those
seeking to prosecute subversive behavior could be met without
creating a witch-hunt environment.
THE LEFT has become apocalyptic, shrieking
about McCarthyism, fascism and the burial of democracy. It alleges
that the country is being transformed into a totalitarian state, and
suggests that this Knesset initiative represents
the first step toward imposing a Stalinist regime. An
editorial in Haaretz went so far as to state that the
government is transforming our society into one akin to China, North
Korea and Iran.
But acting against such groups is neither
Bolshevism nor fascism. It is a common- sense approach by a
democratic government under siege from its neighbors and determined
to defend itself. While freedom of expression must be protected,
that does not provide a right to indulge in subversion or treason.
The fall of the Weimar Republic in Germany prior to Nazism was a
warning that a democracy which fails to suppress antidemocratic
elements from within can be destroyed by such forces.
ileibler@netvision.net.il
|