Israeli Academic Extremism
Isi Leibler, retired
Senior Vice President of the World Jewish Congress, calls for
legislation to “deny tenure” for tenured Anti-Israel Academics
Regrettably, successive Israeli
governments failed to respond even when professors at universities
funded by Israeli taxpayers and Diaspora Zionists began exploiting
their positions to delegitimize their country. They identified with
Israel's enemies, calling on the world to boycott Israeli
institutions, including their own universities. Israel prides itself
on being the only country in the region in which genuine freedom of
expression reigns supreme. … To tolerate such abominations in the
name of freedom of expression is taking an ideal to a lunatic
extreme. Besides, it is hard to visualize the authorities adopting
such a laissez faire approach had the offenders been racists,
fascists or even radical right-wing extremists. In fact, when senior
academics like Ben-Gurion University's Neve Gordon, call Israel an
"apartheid state" and encourage the world to boycott Israeli
institutions, they are the ones abusing academic freedom. It is thus
high time for the Knesset to set up a non-partisan commission to
recommend legislation to deny tenure at state-sponsored institutions
to those indulging in such activities.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1254756248100&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Candidly
Speaking: Marginalize the renegades
Isi Leibler , THE JERUSALEM POST
Oct. 5, 2009
The exploitation of Judge Goldstone's
Jewish background by our enemies intensifies our obligation to
confront the enemy within - renegade Jews - including Israelis who
stand at the vanguard of global efforts to demonize and delegitimize
the Jewish state. Such odious Jews can be traced back to apostates
during the Middle Ages who fabricated blood libels and vile
distortions of Jewish religious practice for Christian anti-Semites
to incite hatred which culminated in massacres. It was in response
to these renegades that the herem (excommunication) was
introduced.
More recent examples include Jewish
communists who, in addition to undermining campaigns to liberate
Soviet Jews and defending state-sponsored anti-Semitism, even
applauded the Stalinist execution of their kinsmen on bogus charges.
Like their contemporary counterparts, some of them attempted to
depict themselves as devoted Jews championing "world peace."
In practice they simply advanced the
objectives of the Evil Empire. They were regarded as pariahs and
isolated from the Jewish mainstream.
Israel's first prime minister, David
Ben-Gurion, took ruthless measures against Israeli renegades,
insisting also that Israeli embassies maintain close ties with local
Jewish leaders and persuade them to refrain from publicly
criticizing policies impinging on security. The consensus was that
it would be immoral for Jews abroad to influence decisions that
could have life-and-death implications for Israeli citizens.
Unfortunately, in the wake of the Oslo
Accords, the massive divisions which tore Israeli society apart
shattered this convention, ironically with right-wing politicians
encouraging Diaspora leaders to undermine the Rabin government.
This occurred simultaneously with the
rise of post-Zionism, vigorously promoted by the daily newspaper
Ha'aretz, which published critiques of Zionist doctrine until
then considered beyond the pale by the vast majority of Israelis.
Ha'aretz
also launched an English internet edition which emboldened Diaspora
Jewish extremists and provided a green light to global media outlets
to run demonizing articles about Israel on the grounds that they had
already appeared in a "reputable" Israeli daily. The most recent
example was the Ha'aretz campaign defaming the IDF, which
proved to be entirely baseless but created an enormous global
upsurge of anti-Israeli hysteria and eased the way for the Goldstone
Report.
IN THIS atmosphere, fringe groups of
"non-Jewish Jews," many with no prior involvement in Jewish life,
exploited their Jewish origins or Israeli nationality to defame
Israel. Today, they occupy leading roles fueling global anti-Israel
campaigns.
Regrettably, successive Israeli
governments failed to respond even when professors at universities
funded by Israeli taxpayers and Diaspora Zionists began exploiting
their positions to delegitimize their country. They identified with
Israel's enemies, calling on the world to boycott Israeli
institutions, including their own universities.
Israel prides itself on being the only
country in the region in which genuine freedom of expression reigns
supreme. But it is also a country under siege, surrounded by
neighbors seeking its destruction and confronted by an ever-hostile
global community. To tolerate such abominations in the name of
freedom of expression is taking an ideal to a lunatic extreme.
Besides, it is hard to visualize the authorities adopting such a
laissez faire approach had the offenders been racists, fascists or
even radical right-wing extremists.
In fact, when senior academics like
Ben-Gurion University's Neve Gordon, call Israel an "apartheid
state" and encourage the world to boycott Israeli institutions, they
are the ones abusing academic freedom.
It is thus high time for the Knesset to
set up a non-partisan commission to recommend legislation to deny
tenure at state-sponsored institutions to those indulging in such
activities.
The rot has extended to the Diaspora,
especially Europe and has also affected the United States. Highly
vocal Jewish groups like the recently created J Street describe
themselves as 'Zionist' but their prime objective is to pressure the
US government to use "tough love" against Israel - a euphemism for
demanding that the Jewish state make further unilateral concessions
to neighbors pledged to its annihilation.
In the past two weeks alone, a host of
new anti-Israeli initiatives were reported. In Toronto, Jews were at
the forefront of a campaign to boycott Israeli films at a film
festival because the anniversary of Tel Aviv - 'built on the
destroyed villages of Palestinians' - was being celebrated; two
Israeli women who evaded national service are conducting a North
American campus tour under the auspices of 'Jewish Voice for Peace'
to persuade students to intensify their role in the "resistance
movement"; in San Francisco the local Jewish Federation is providing
funds for a film festival which promotes the vilest anti-Israel
films; radical Rabbi Michael Lerner invited a woman who justifies
suicide bombings to address his synagogue on Yom Kippur; and so on.
IM EIN ani li mi li?
If we are not for ourselves, who will be? We are engaged in a battle
against fiendish enemies committed to our destruction. The Israeli
government must now take steps to neutralize the impact of renegade
Jews who present themselves as legitimate alternative Jewish
viewpoints. Such an initiative by a country which provides genuine
democratic rights to all its citizens, including Arabs, could hardly
be categorized as eradicating freedom of expression. It would rather
represent a highly overdue effort to exorcise such odious groups
from the mainstream and expose them as unrepresentative fringe
groups with no standing.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is
currently riding a wave after his superb United Nations address. He
should summon a global Jewish solidarity conference encompassing
Jewish leaders, opinion makers, philanthropists and activists
similar to that organized in 1989 under the auspices of then prime
minister Yitzhak Shamir and then defense minister Yitzhak Rabin in
order to demonstrate the unity of the Jewish people.
At a time when we desperately seek
allies, in addition to encouraging millions of Jews in the Diaspora
who remain committed to Israel to become more actively engaged in
our struggle, such a gathering would also provide an opportunity to
exorcise the renegades from our midst.
|