|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Israeli Academic Extremism
Knesset holds hearings on the Tenured Anti-Israel
Extremists and their suppression of Academic Freedom
The complaints that reached the committee
concerned departments such as sociology and political science, as
well as law faculties. As part of its "partnership with
organizations" effort, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of
Law, according to its website, has academic partnerships with dozens
of NGOs from the extreme left, including B'Tselem, Amnesty
International, Yesh Din, Machsom Watch and the Association for Civil
Rights in Israel. A few of these, such as Adalah and Mada al-Carmel,
deny Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state. Students who
volunteer with these NGOs are awarded scholarships, and at
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev they even receive credit.
A considerable number of instructors in these
departments teach their students that Israel is the spearhead of
colonialism in the Middle East, that Zionism is a racist movement
that supports expulsion and that the Law of Return is racist. They
call for getting rid of "Hatikva," the national anthem, and the
other symbols of the Jewish state, and quote from "research"
establishing that Israel is a war-mongering nation. And if all that
were not enough, students have complained, anyone who dares to
protest is reprimanded and pays the price in their grades, while
faculty members who fail to toe the line are not promoted.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/israel-s-academics-protect-the-mccarthyites-of-zionism-1.322815
Israel's academics protect the McCarthyites
of Zionism
A considerable number of instructors in these departments
teach their students that Israel is the spearhead of colonialism in
the Middle East, that Zionism is a racist movement that supports
expulsion and that the Law of Return is racist.
By Israel Harel
Published 04.11.10
In the wake of reports that were compiled in regard to
anti-Zionist slants in research and instruction in a number of the
country's university social sciences faculties, and after students
and teachers complained about being reprimanded and insulted when
they voiced their opposition, on Tuesday the Knesset Education
Committee debated the issue. Lo and behold, members of the Knesset -
so protective of freedom of expression of this body - claimed that
the discussion is not legitimate.
The very act of discussing academia at the Knesset, argued
several MKs, including Haim Oron, Nitzan Horowitz, Ahmed Tibi, Raleb
Majadele and Orit Zuaretz, is a violation of academic freedom.
University heads who attended the session echoed the same
sentiments.
They were not reassured by the calming words of committee
chairman Zevulun Orlev, nor the admonishments of Education Minister
Gideon Sa'ar, according to which there was no intention, heaven
forfend, of dictating curriculum. Rather, the purpose was to
determine, for the sake of the universities' public image, whether
the hue and cry was founded. But the MKs stood firm.
One can imagine how these legislators - these in particular -
would react were the Shin Bet security service, or the Israel
Defense Forces, or the Mossad, to claim that discussing matters
pertaining to it in the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense
Committee harms national security. After all, the MKs would say, the
main purpose of this committee is to supervise the defense
establishment. And of course they would react similarly to any
criticism of the Knesset over any other public entity in the state
with the exception of the Holy of Holies, academia.
The complaints that reached the committee concerned departments
such as sociology and political science, as well as law faculties.
As part of its "partnership with organizations" effort, the Hebrew
University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law, according to its website,
has academic partnerships with dozens of NGOs from the extreme left,
including B'Tselem, Amnesty International, Yesh Din, Machsom Watch
and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel. A few of these, such
as Adalah and Mada al-Carmel, deny Israel's right to exist as a
Jewish state. Students who volunteer with these NGOs are awarded
scholarships, and at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev they even
receive credit.
A considerable number of instructors in these departments teach
their students that Israel is the spearhead of colonialism in the
Middle East, that Zionism is a racist movement that supports
expulsion and that the Law of Return is racist. They call for
getting rid of "Hatikva," the national anthem, and the other symbols
of the Jewish state, and quote from "research" establishing that
Israel is a war-mongering nation. And if all that were not enough,
students have complained, anyone who dares to protest is reprimanded
and pays the price in their grades, while faculty members who fail
to toe the line are not promoted.
Is it any wonder, then, that few dissenting voices are heard and
that they are lampooned? Where can one find a respected unversity
abroad that would dare to host on sabbatical a declared Zionist who
has been pegged as a McCarthyite?
In their false championing of the precious and genuine value of
freedom of expression, the university heads are protecting the real
McCarthyites, those who libel the state and Zionism and who suppress
the brave, decent teachers. The leaders of these institutions have
themselves, as one admitted to me, been threatened with the
McCarthyite label if they stray from the path, but one could still
expect better from them.
Those who believe that they would be able to continuously recruit
these departments to serve the purposes of the radical-left NGOs in
the name of "academic partnership" are wrong. They will never be
able to avoid criticism by terrorizing their critics or by libeling
those, at home or abroad, who expose their real face.
The Council for Higher Education must wake up. If the university
establishment persists in extending full protection to them and
their ilk, and in ignoring the broad public criticism, it will be
responsible for the decline in the public image of the universities,
especially the image of the social sciences and humanities
faculties.
|