Israeli Academic
Extremism
The Israeli Far Left congenitally disposed to treason?
After the assassination of Rabin, every Israeli
newspaper and leftist commentator denounced Bar-Ilan University,
where Yigal Amir had been a law student. Many even called for
shutting the university down. Not one of those same people has
called for closing down Tel Aviv University, where Kamm was a
student in the history and philosophy departments and where,
together with the sociology and political science departments at TAU,
one would have to search long and hard to find faculty members who
are not leftists or out and out communists.
Not a single mainstream media outlet in Israel
is denouncing the radicals at Tel Aviv University for inspiring and
breeding Anat Kamm, nor are pundits calling for the university to
undertake a complete "critical self-examination" to understand its
own guilt, which is what they had demanded of Bar-Ilan.
http://www.jewishpress.com/pageroute.do/43338
Yet Another Case Of Leftist Treason
Steven Plaut
Posted Apr 14 2010
It was even before the assassination of Yitzhak
Rabin by Yigal Amir that the Israeli Left, led by the Haaretz
newspaper, chanted in unison what has become one of its fundamental
political axioms: political violence is a congenital inclination of
the Israeli Right and is committed exclusively by right-wingers.
Naturally, after the assassination of Rabin the
assertion became a matter of unchallengeable theology.
The media obsession with the alleged violent
inclination of the Israeli Right long served to obscure the
congenital inclination towards treason and espionage by a great many
members of the Israeli Left. The simple fact of the matter is that
every single incident of anti-Israel espionage has involved
left-wing Israelis.
The scandal that was just made public in
Israel, after a local court order prohibiting its publicity was
lifted, involves Anat Kamm (spelled Kam in some news accounts), a
young leftist who leaked classified military documents to Haaretz.
She stole more than 2,000 such documents and passed them on to her
Haaretz handler, a leftist journalist named Uri Blau, now in hiding
in the UK. Haaretz ran some stories using information extracted from
some of the material.
As alluded to above, Kamm is far from the first
Israeli leftist to be involved in treason and espionage. In the
1950s the Israeli communist parties were rife with Soviet
collaborationists. Closer to our own time, Mordecai Vanunu, the
notorious nuclear spy, was a member of the Israeli communist party.
Marcus Klinberg spied in Israel on behalf of the Soviets for years.
Azmi Bishara, who spied for Hizbullah, was a leading member of
Israel's Arab Left.
The worst espionage-cum-terror ring that
operated in Israel was organized in the 1970s by kibbutz-born
communist Udi Adiv. Leftist Tali Fahima was imprisoned for helping
her Palestinian boyfriend plan terror attacks.
And of course there are hundreds of Israeli
academic leftists who currently promote boycotts of Israel as well
as mutiny and insurrection by Israeli soldiers.
Haaretz has never run editorials about the
inclinations of leftists to engage in treason and espionage. The
Right almost universally denounced Yigal Amir. The Left is
celebrating Anat Kamm as a great patriot.
After the assassination of Rabin, every Israeli
newspaper and leftist commentator denounced Bar-Ilan University,
where Yigal Amir had been a law student. Many even called for
shutting the university down. Not one of those same people has
called for closing down Tel Aviv University, where Kamm was a
student in the history and philosophy departments and where,
together with the sociology and political science departments at TAU,
one would have to search long and hard to find faculty members who
are not leftists or out and out communists.
Not a single mainstream media outlet in Israel
is denouncing the radicals at Tel Aviv University for inspiring and
breeding Anat Kamm, nor are pundits calling for the university to
undertake a complete "critical self-examination" to understand its
own guilt, which is what they had demanded of Bar-Ilan.
In 1940 Winston Churchill shut down all the
newspapers and media operated by the British Union of Fascists, the
pro-German party led by Oswald Mosley. It was one of his first acts
as prime minister. Some 740 leading members of the party, including
Mosley, spent the duration of the war in prison. Like Haaretz, their
newspapers had launched a "peace campaign" (with Nazi Germany) and
reflexively supported the enemies of their country in just about
everything.
Until now, Haaretz was a newspaper given to
political stands many deemed treasonous but not a newspaper actually
involved in treason and espionage. It has a market share in Israel
of 6 or 7 percent, and I suspect that at least half its subscribers
get the paper in spite of its anti-Israel ideology and thanks to its
business supplement The Marker, the best in Israel. (I am one such
subscriber.)
But now we have discovered that Haaretz has
gone beyond merely championing dangerous appeasement. Will Prime
Minister Netanyahu have the courage of Churchill and shut down the
newspaper for the duration of Israel's war with Arab jihadists? (At
least two Knesset members have called on Netanyahu to do just that.)
Will he imprison extremists supporting the country's enemies in time
of war?
What Kamm did was worse than what Jonathan
Pollard was convicted of in the U.S., so Kamm and Blau should be
sentenced to a prison term at least as long as that being served by
Pollard.
Haaretz for its part is
bragging
about its role in the espionage and trying to spin it as
a great act of patriotism. Really. After all, among the classified
documents stolen by Kamm and passed on to Haaretz were a couple that
described Israeli military plans to continue targeted assassinations
against Hamas terrorists despite an Israeli Supreme Court order
commanding the military and executive branch to stop those
assassinations.
Now, if the Israeli military was indeed
planning to ignore the Supreme Court's ruling, it should be cheered
for doing so. Because the ruling that prohibited targeted
assassinations of terrorists was itself grossly illegal and
unconstitutional. It was one of the worst outrages by Israeli
Supreme Court justices dedicated to "judicial activism," the
anti-democratic doctrine of judicial tyranny that insists that the
court need not base its rulings on actual laws or constitutional
powers.
There is absolutely no legal basis for the
Israeli Supreme Court to interfere in the management of Israel's war
against terrorism. The court has no legitimate standing to dictate
to the military how it should pursue its tasks.
But that, of course, is not
how Haaretz
is spinning it. Haaretz strongly supports judicial
activism because judicial activists in their rulings usually impose
items from the leftist agenda upon the country.
Kamm, meanwhile, has become the poster girl of
Israel's Far Left, which is increasingly open and brazen in its
treasonous political positions. For years now, all too many Israeli
leftists have supported the enfoldment of Israel into a Palestinian
"bi-national" state, promoted the Palestinian "Right of Return,"
organized lawbreaking and insurrection by soldiers, vandalized
Israel's security wall, engaged in violent hooliganism against
soldiers and police, and in some cases even cheered on acts of Arab
terror and served as human shields for murderers.
Actual espionage is but a mere baby step beyond
all that.
Steven Plaut is a professor at Haifa
University. His book "The Scout" is available at
Amazon.com.
He can be contacted at
steveneplaut@yahoo.com.
|