|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
Van-Leer Watch
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv University - A Summary of Anat Matar's hard work at destroying
Israel through creating a "Right of Return" for "Palestinian
refugees"
http://www.ror1state.org/drupal/?q=en/node/93
The Haifa Conference for the Right of Return And the Secular
Democratic State in Palestine Initial Report
By: Yoav Bar (*)
Sort of Apology
Friday and Saturday,
20-21 of June, 2008 – after a year of dreaming and working for it to
happen – the Haifa conference was such a great success that we
hardly believed it was real… But on Saturday night, as we made the 5
minutes drive from elMidan back home to Hallisa, a poor, mostly
Arab, neighborhood in east Haifa, the racist and Un-Democratic state
of Israel was clearly and vigorously there – the streets were filled
with police and special “anti riot” units, stopping people and
beating them at random. We spent the next week collecting evidence
and organizing a demonstration against police violence…
All of you who tried to follow the preparations to the conference,
or who are concerned to see the results, might have been frustrated
with the chaotic performance of the initiating committee. Others
have criticized us for diverting effort from the urgent struggle
against the occupation to pipe dreaming a remote future… One thing
special about the Haifa conference was that it was initiated and
organized by grassroots political activists, in the middle of an
intense period of struggles, without budget. It was our moment to
raise our heads from the exhausting daily struggle and promise
ourselves and the world that the suffering of the Palestinian people
may be brought to an end and there can be a bright future for
everybody in Palestine after we get rid of the racist Zionist
disorder.
Who was there?
Youth
Meetings
As a gathering of
political activists, working for the future, we started with the
youth. The proliferation of independent youth Palestinian movements
within the 48 territories is one proof that the new generation is
not satisfied with the traditional political offerings. At the Midan
theatre, on June 20, 17:00, the conference started with youth
meetings – not lecturing to the youth but activists from different
youth movements discussing among themselves their views of the
future. There were two parallel sessions, one for High School
students and the other for the “Shabab”, university students and
young workers, mostly in their twenties.
The
Opening Session
At the opening session,
the 300-seat hall of the Midan theatre was almost full. There were
several Arab TV crews, including Al Jazeera, taking interviews with
political leaders, and reporters from local Arab newspapers. Several
Palestinian flags were on the stage, as well as a sign in Arabic,
Hebrew and English declaring the “Haifa Conference for the Right of
Return and the Secular Democratic State in Palestine”. Sahar Abdo,
the presenter, called Hanan Wakeem to sing “Mawteni” (My Homeland),
and the public stood up to the song and observed a moment of silence
for the martyrs. Rajaa Zo’abi ‘Omari welcomed the public in the name
of the initiating committee, and outlined the vision of the
conference.
The main part of the opening ceremony included political speeches by
the general secretaries of three parties in the 48 territories:
Ayman ‘Odeh from the Democratic Front for Peace and Equality (Hadash
- a front that includes the Communist party), Awad Abed El-Fatah
from the National Democratic Alliance (BALAD) and Muhammad Kana’ane
from Abnaa elBalad, the movement that was the backbone of the
coalition that constituted the Initiating Committee. The appearance
of Muhammad Kana’ane was most significant as (on 28/5) he was newly
released from four and a half years in Israeli prisons, after he was
sentenced for political meetings with Palestinian activists in
Jordan.
In the second part of the opening session, there were three speeches
in Hebrew: Yehuda Kupferman from the “Committee for a secular and
democratic state in the whole of Palestine”, and Dr Uri Davis from
“the movement against Israeli Apartheid in Palestine” – both from
the initiating committee, and Dr Anat Matar, a leading activists in
support of the rights of Palestinian prisoners and for the rights of
Israeli youth to refuse serving in the Israeli army.
There were also written congratulations to the conference, mostly
from like minded activists in the 67 occupied territories and the
Palestinian diaspora who could not come. The most significant
written participation came from the Secretary General of the Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Comrade Ahmad Sa’adat, from
the Nafha prison in the Naqab desert.
Who was not there?
Professor Bhim Singh
from Kashmir, who had to represent the international delegation in
the opening session, could not get a visa from the Israeli embassy
in India.
A group of Palestinian academics (with foreign passports) from Bir
Zeit University were on the bus from Jerusalem to Haifa, coming to
take part in the conference, as the bus was intercepted mid-way in
Kfar Saba by Israeli security forces. They were held for several
hours and forced to return to Jerusalem.
The Islamic Movement was invited to take part in the conference, as
partners in the struggle against Israeli oppression, in accordance
to the organizers belief that the secular democratic state is a
framework to defend everybody’s rights and to ensure full respect to
all religions. They didn’t officially reject the invitation and the
task of building cooperation with them is left for the follow up
committee that was formed in the conference.
Saturday
full of Workshops
The real attraction in
the conference was the workshops program, 3 workshops in parallel at
each of 3 sessions. In the 9 workshops there were 41 registered
contributors, in addition to the facilitators, all of them leading
activists and intellectuals. The list of participants’ names, more
than 50 of them, on the invitation was a parade of support for the
conference, and it was probably the main reason why, while we
initially expected the second day of long discussions to have
restricted participation, we came Saturday morning and found the
premises of elMidan full with festive atmosphere, with many
Palestinian activists from different political movements and parties
and from many civil society organizations. There was a very
significant presence of Jewish activists as well, probably the
widest participation in a Palestinian political event ever (except,
of course, mass demonstration, where everybody comes but there’s not
much interaction). There was also a significant presence from
international solidarity movements – most of them young activists
that volunteer in different programs to support the Palestinian
people and came on the weekend to Haifa to support the conference.
All in all between 300 and 400 people took part in different
workshops on Saturday, with lively discussion about many aspects of
the problem, the struggle and the solution.
The enthusaistic atmosphere created the conditions for the most
serious discussion that characterized the workshops. The
participants made their best to clarify their positions, and the
public took active part in the discussion. Many different approaches
were proposed, but it only contributed the confidence that we can do
important things together.
What Happened at the Conference?
Details
of the Proceedings
I will not dare try to
give here any short description of the contents of some 20 hours of
discussion in the workshops and full sessions. About half of it was
filmed and should go online anytime soon. We also requested all the
participants to write down their contributions, and some of it is
already on the conference’s site:
www.ror1state.org. There are also written contributions from
many writers that could not make it to the conference.
The full list of participants is on the invitation, and may be seen
on the website. To introduce each of them and write a little about
their experience in struggle or their writing or other achievements
requires a big book - only the internet can give practical answers
to this task.
Palestinian Popular Festival
Some of the more
sophisticated writers that attended the conference promised to write
special articles about the atmosphere that filled elMidan, before
going after the conference political and social contents. It was all
organized on the principle of a Palestinian popular festival –
covering for the lack of budget with the effort of tens of
activists, like the family in a wedding party, running around all
the time to take care for the guests. Tens of the participants from
outside the area were invited to be guests in the homes of local
activists; Lunch was traditional wedding’s home made food, and after
220 meals were served the rest was contributed to a local welfare
institution; Simultaneous translation to Hebrew and English was done
by political activists, and in most cases more to the point than the
mechanical translation of many professionals.
All Palestinian Gathering
The most important thing about the
Haifa conference is its place as part of an all Palestinian
awakening for a new vision that will pose alternatives to the dead
end of the Imperialist-led fake “peace process”. The problem, the
struggle and the solution are all common to all parts of the
Palestinian people, as was seen throughout the conference. It was
stressed in the workshop on ethnic cleansing exposing how it is
practiced by Zionism from before 1948 until these days, in the 1948
occupied territories as well as in Gaza and the West Bank and the
Syrian Golan. It was clear from the concentration on the right of
return of all Palestinian refugees to all the areas from which they
were expelled.
Even though only few Palestinians from the 67 occupied territories,
mostly from Jerusalem, could come to Haifa, the conference was part
of a wider movement: Ajras elAwda, one of the components of the
initiating committee is an all-Palestinian network. Ajras published
a special magazine on the occasion and distributed it in Palestinian
refugee camps in Syria. Special meetings are now taking place in
Ramallah to promote the same ideas, and in Haifa we listened to the
written participation of Ahmad Katamesh from Ramallah presenting his
view toward the future democratic state in Palestine. Salame Kelly,
a leading Palestinian activist and Arab Marxist from Syria, sent a
speech on video that had to be part of the opening ceremony (but we
failed to show it due to technical problems).
The
Palestinians in the 1948 territories
For a long time
Palestinian in the territories who came under Israeli control in
1948 were a smashed society, licking the wounds of the 1948 Nakba
which included many massacres and the ethnic cleansing of the
majority of the population. Some tried to pursue a course of
struggle for equal rights within the Israeli context outside of a
Palestinian national perspective, but were always frustrated by
Zionist systematic racism, that defines the goal of the state as
serving the “international Jewish nation”. In the nineties of the
last century, some tried to pose a perspective of redefining Israel
as a state of all its citizens. The Haifa conference was an
opportunity to examine in historic perspective all these failed
attempts at reforming the racist system, and propose a solution to
the suffering from Israeli Apartheid in the context of a
comprehensive solution to the Palestinian problem.
It was clear from the list of participants that the discussion of a
secular democratic state in Palestine is not confined to Abnaa
elBalad, which always promoted this solution, or to radical circles
around it. Salman Natur and Hisham Naffa from Hadash, as well as Dr.
Mahmoud Muhareb and Yael Lerer from Balad are just some of the more
famous promoters of the one state solution. But also the speeches of
the secretary generals of Hadash and Balad in the opening ceremony
revealed a lot of soul searching and internal conflicts in relation
to this perspective. It would not be far-fetched to conclude that
there is a majority of Palestinians within the 1948 territories that
prefer the secular democratic state, while the main reservation is
about the practicality of posing this slogan at the current stage,
but there is also no much illusions left about any practical
solution to the Palestinian problem as long as the United State and
Israel are calling the shots.
The massive presence in the conference
of activists from the Palestinian civil society is another show of
maturity of the society’s confrontation with the harsh conditions of
Israeli Apartheid. While there is a whole class of people that
dedicate their lives to caring for the daily needs of the people,
from education to health, to workers’ rights, women’s rights,
economic and social development, culture and much else, almost
nobody expects solutions to those problems outside of a framework of
political change. We didn’t expect the local NGOS to take a clear
political position, and all participants were presenting their
personal views on their own responsibility. Ameer Makhoul from
Ittijah, Union of Palestinian community-based organizations - an
umbrella organization for Palestinian NGOs - was on the initiating
committee from its onset, and we had the participation of many
leading personalities from NGOs covering most areas of public lives.
Jewish
Participation
The numbers are not the
only measure, and we still didn’t process the registration papers,
but the participation of Jewish activists in the conference was very
obvious. They covered a whole rainbow from released political
prisoners, through different trends of the traditional left,
feminists, Oriental Jews (Arab Jews) activists, anarchists, anti war
activists, academics, religious activists for peace, democrats,
cosmopolitans and many more… But the most significant part was not
their presence but the way that they were integral part of the whole
conference, not as a separate entity trying to negotiate or to come
to terms with a separate Palestinian entity, but as part of a common
gathering trying to figure out a common future and how to bring it
about.
The Concluding Declaration
When we finally arrived
to the concluding plenary, we were not only tired and much beyond
the schedule, but it was also clear that the inputs of the
conference are too many and too important to try to conclude them in
one hour’s discussion. The initiating committee decided to present
to the participants the draft position paper on which we agreed
after long internal discussion, a paper named “The Jaffa
Declaration” in tribute to the city where the initiating committee
was holding its meetings while it was discussing the document
through the first months of the year.
The
Jaffa Declaration
The establishment of
the Democratic Secular state in the whole of Palestine is the
positive solution that will accomplish justice and will bring an end
to the struggle on the Palestinian land as it:
1. Preserve the unity of the Palestinian people and their historic
connection to the Palestinian land.
2. Achieve the goals of the liberation struggle of all the
Palestinian people: The return of the refugees, freedom, equality
and the right of self determination.
3. Strip the Jewish presence in Palestine of its colonialist nature,
which is connected to the racist Zionist project, as a tool of
imperialism and global capitalism.
4. Be based on the principle of separation between religion and the
state, while assuring the freedom of believers in all religions to
practice their religion.
5. Assure full equality in the rights of all citizens without
discrimination on the basis of religion, race, ethnicity, gender,
nationality, class or any other reason.
What
Next?
The declaration was
read to the public and received general approval as the base for the
concluding statement of the conference. Several important comments
were made by the public, mostly for additional positions, to be
added to the declaration.
Many of the participants asked to join the initiating committee, to
form together the follow up committee that will continue the work
for these goals after the conference. Hundreds of the participants
signed up and requested to be informed of the next steps.
----------------------
(*) The writer is a
member of the political bureau of Abnaa elBalad and was active in
the initiating committee of the Haifa conference
|