Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv University – Carlo Strenger (Dept of Psychology) claims
Israel is Fascist because Israelis want a Loyalty Oath for new
Citizens
It may be frightening, but it’s time to realize
where we live. Isaac Herzog is wrong when he says that fascism lurks
at the fringes of Israeli society. It is now in the mainstream.
After all, even the majority of Likud ministers have voted for the
shameful new citizenship law amendment.
Israel is now facing a fateful question: will
it remain a liberal democracy, or is it on the way to becoming a
totalitarian ethnocracy?
http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/strenger-than-fiction/strenger-than-fiction-loyalty-oath-is-not-about-arabs-it-s-about-hatred-of-liberal-values-1.318406
Loyalty oath is not about Arabs, it’s about
hatred of liberal values
Isaac Herzog is wrong when he says that fascism lurks at the
fringes of Israeli society. It is now in the mainstream.
By Carlo Strenger
Published 11.10.10
There is nothing left to say about how bad, harmful and useless
the new citizenship law is: Labor Party Minister Isaac Herzog has
warned that it is another step towards fascism; legal experts like
Mordechai Kremnitzer have pointed out that it doesn’t serve any
identifiable purpose except making Arabs feeling even less at home
in Israel. Likud Ministers Benny Begin and Dan Meridor have pointed
out how harmful the law is for the relation with Israeli Arabs and
for Israel’s standing in the world.
Both Shas and Yisrael Beiteinu have already declared that they
see this law as just a first step in a general attempt towards
ensuring loyalty to the state by legislation. The time has come to
ask what really stands behind this rising tide. The obvious answer
seems to be that it is directed against both Israel’s Arab
citizenry, whom Avigdor Lieberman is alienating and insulting almost
every day, and Palestinians who want to gain Israeli citizenship.
But I think that this is not the whole story.
Consider this strangest of alliances between Yisrael Beiteinu and
Shas; one is a completely secular, ultra-nationalist, the other an
ultra-Orthodox party. What do they have in common? Why are they
lately so effectively cooperating with each other, together with
other extreme-right parties?
I believe that what unites them is less a fear of Israel’s
enemies (and Israel does have enemies). It is a visceral hatred for
the Western values and the liberal ethos. They all hate freedom;
they all hate the idea of critical, open discourse, in which ideas
are discussed according to their merit. They keep criticizing what
they see as the liberal bias of the media and academia, and they
have made sustained attempts to curtail freedom of speech at the
universities.
Lieberman’s disdain for these ideas breaks through at every
possible moment: lately
he has insulted French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner and Spanish
Foreign Minister Miguel Moratinos, telling them they should take
care of their own problems in Europe before they come to advise
Israel. This has been typical of him for a long time: Lieberman
thinks that Israel should turn east; that it should no longer define
itself as a Western country, and should finally shake off Israel’s
original commitment to be part of the Western world.
Shas has made clear for decades that it just plays along with
democracy; that it doesn’t believe in the idea of citizens thinking
critically: they believe that only their spiritual leader, Ovadia
Yossef, must determine what is right and what is wrong. Other
ultra-rightists have been feeling for a long time that the
commitment to universal values is undermining their program for the
greater Israel in which Palestinians should have no political
rights.
They cannot stand the idea that a liberal democracy should be
based on rational legislation and is open to criticism by all. They
are furious that tribal loyalty is not above criticism. Just lately,
national religious rabbis have claimed that studying at universities
is a danger for young religious people, because they internalize too
many enlightenment values.
We are really talking about a right-wing anti-liberal coalition
united by an instinctive hatred against the idea that there are
universal standards of rationality and of morality. They do not want
to hear criticism of their worldviews that relies on ideas that
have, for a long time, been common to the free world. What we are
seeing is a fight about Israel’s cultural and political identity.
It may be frightening, but it’s time to realize where we live.
Isaac Herzog is wrong when he says that fascism lurks at the fringes
of Israeli society. It is now in the mainstream. After all, even the
majority of Likud ministers have voted for the shameful new
citizenship law amendment.
Israel is now facing a fateful question: will it remain a liberal
democracy, or is it on the way to becoming a totalitarian ethnocracy?
This is not a rhetorical question. Democracies do not turn into
autocratic regimes from one day to the next; it mostly happens step
by step. The ugly wave of anti-liberal legislation we are witnessing
shows that Israel has embarked on a slippery slope; and we cannot
know where it will end. The day may well come when Lieberman and
Yishai will argue that critical articles about the government are
disloyal to the state, and must be forbidden; and the day may come
where the repeated attempts to shut off academics who do not show
sufficient “loyalty” will succeed, and they will be fired or jailed.
It is a truly terrible tragedy: we Jews have suffered throughout
history from repressive, authoritarian regimes that accused Jews of
not being sufficiently German, French, Russian or Spanish. We Jews
have experienced the blessing of the enlightenment ideals that allow
Jews around the world to live dignified lives and participate in
liberal democracies. And the Jewish state is about to gradually
erase these values, enshrined in Israel’s Declaration of
Independence.
The likes of Eli Yishai and Lieberman cannot possibly be
influenced by arguments like this. After all, they hate
Enlightenment values and the principles of liberal democracy. But
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with whom I disagree in many
respects, is, at heart, a believer in classical liberalism. He must
ask himself whether he can live with the fact that, for the sake of
political short-term gain, he is harming Israel’s democracy
irretrievably.
And Isaac Herzog must understand that giving interviews saying
that fascism is becoming a danger in no way absolves him from the
responsibility of being a member of the government that is gradually
burying Israel’s democracy.
|