Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv University - Carlo Strenger (Dept of Psychology) plugs
IsraCampus
Paradoxically, the simultaneous campaign
against Israel's universities waged by Israel's right wing actually
lends credibility to the assertion that these academic institutions
are actually bastions of enlightened ideals of objective neutrality.
In accusing the academia of promoting anti-Zionist ideas, the direct
opposite of what the European boycotters are claiming, Israel's
right, of all groups, is actually proving the universities'
neutrality.
It has been asserted that the universities are bastions of
anti-Zionism, that don't allow room for Zionist views and that are
full of professors who are anti-Israeli self-hating Jews supplying
Israel's enemies with ammunition. There are
right-wing [sic] websites [link to IsraCampus.Org.il]
that feature "galleries of rogues," - anti-Israel professors,
intellectuals and pundits.
One right wing organization tried to pressure
the president of Beer Sheva's Ben-Gurion University to fire
left-wing lecturers by threatening to convince donors to withhold
funds. And now Education Minister Gideon Saar and the Knesset
education committee are looking into the possibility of
establishing an 'ethics code' for Israel's universities.
Ostensibly this is intended to make sure that students and lecturers
are not being intimidated for expressing right-wing views, and to
make sure that the Zionist viewpoint is fairly represented in the
curricula of the social sciences and humanities courses. In reality,
it is a blatant attempt to exert political pressures on Israel's
universities.
http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/strenger-than-fiction/academic-objectivity-rises-above-assaults-by-europe-s-left-and-israel-s-right-1.323817
Academic objectivity rises above assaults by
Europe's left and Israel's right
After endless boycott attempts accusing Israel's universities of
cooperating with the occupation, now Israel's right is waging a
totalitarian campaign against what they term 'anti-Zionism.'
By Carlo Strenger
Published 09.11.10
Recent years have seen a number of attempts,
primarily out of Britain, to boycott Israel's universities.
Sometimes the justification is that the universities are
collaborating with the occupation of the West Bank; sometimes simply
that this is an easy way to put pressure on Israel to finally stop
the occupation.
I have in the past argued that boycotting Israel's universities
goes against the spirit of academia, and that it is politically
unwise, because it actually achieves the opposite of what it aims to
achieve by weakening one of the institutions most identified with
universalist values in Israel.
Paradoxically, the simultaneous campaign
against Israel's universities waged by Israel's right wing actually
lends credibility to the assertion that these academic institutions
are actually bastions of enlightened ideals of objective neutrality.
In accusing the academia of promoting anti-Zionist ideas, the direct
opposite of what the European boycotters are claiming, Israel's
right, of all groups, is actually proving the universities'
neutrality.
It has been asserted that the universities are bastions of
anti-Zionism, that don't allow room for Zionist views and that are
full of professors who are anti-Israeli self-hating Jews supplying
Israel's enemies with ammunition. There are
right-wing websites that feature "galleries of rogues," -
anti-Israel professors, intellectuals and pundits.
One right wing organization tried to pressure
the president of Beer Sheva's Ben-Gurion University to fire
left-wing lecturers by threatening to convince donors to withhold
funds. And now Education Minister Gideon Saar and the Knesset
education committee are looking into the possibility of
establishing an 'ethics code' for Israel's universities.
Ostensibly this is intended to make sure that students and lecturers
are not being intimidated for expressing right-wing views, and to
make sure that the Zionist viewpoint is fairly represented in the
curricula of the social sciences and humanities courses. In reality,
it is a blatant attempt to exert political pressures on Israel's
universities.
If it were true that professors, whether
affiliated with the left or the right, use their academic positions
to promote their views, or that they intimidate students who
dissent, this would indeed be unacceptable. So far the empirical
evidence supporting this claim against the left is minimal, to say
the least. Out of several hundred thousand anonymous student
feedbacks at Tel Aviv University, 147 complaints of this sort were
filed. The strategy employed by the right – calling Israeli
universities McCarthyist bastions of the left - is a rather unsavory
attempt to disguise that the opposite is true: McCarthyism is a good
description for the attempt to pressure Israeli universities into
promoting nationalist values.
Hence Israel's universities are caught in the
crossfire between Israel's right and the European left. Both the
European Left and Israel's Right are violating the core values of
academia. The European left wants professors to be actively engaged
against the occupation; Israel's right wants them to actively
promote a Zionist agenda.
Neither of these is the task of a professor as
professor. While academics, as citizens, are entitled to their
political views like anyone else, it is not part of their job to
promote these. It is our job to provide our students with knowledge
that is well corroborated, and, more than anything, teach them to
evaluate knowledge claims critically. It is neither our job to turn
our students into Zionists nor into anti-Zionists.
I personally happen to hold rather well-defined
liberal-Zionist political views, which I express regularly in the
media, but I do not feel that it is my task as a professor to
convince my students of these views. While I do not hide them –
which would be rather futile, given that they are published - I
believe it is my job to provide my students with intellectual tools
with which they can analyze and critically evaluate theories and
factual claims about any topic, including the Middle East conflict.
As part of my course on the topic, I often
invite guest-lecturers from a wide spectrum of political views,
ranging from the national-religious right to the post-Zionist left.
I leave it up to my students, most of whom consider themselves to be
center-left but also include some right-wing settlers and Israeli
Arabs who strongly oppose Israel's policies, to analyze the
positions for intellectual and moral coherence.
The search for truth and critical thought are
universal values that were promoted by enlightenment movements in
India and classical Greece 2,500 years ago, in Islamic culture 1,100
years ago, and are the core message of modern European Enlightenment
endorsed by many Jewish thinkers ranging from Albert Einstein to
Emanuel Levinas. No totalitarian regime, whether on the right or on
the left, ever welcomed these values, because totalitarianism is
based on shutting down critical thought in all its forms.
The current attack on academic freedom in
Israel coming from the right is unsettling and frightening, and the
pressure aimed at ideological indoctrination will only mount. It
will take courage and stamina to withstand this onslaught on
Enlightenment values. So far Israeli universities have
done so valiantly, and it is to be hoped that we will withstand
the pressure exerted by Israel's increasingly right wing political
establishment and public opinion.
Anyone outside Israel who has, so far, doubted
that Israel's universities are upholding the ideals of impartial
research, can see now that they do their best to uphold academic
values. If Israeli universities didn't refuse to bow to the dictates
of nationalism, they wouldn't be the targets of such a concerted
effort of Israel's right to control them. It is truly infuriating
and disappointing that, instead of backing institutions that try to
foster and protect the values of critical and free thought,
anti-Israelis from the European left, under the guise of defending
human rights, are undermining them by attacking institutions that
promote free thought. In doing so, they betray the very values that
they purport to defend.
|