|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv University - Ronen Shoval, "Im Tirtzu"
Chairman, Documents Yehouda Shenhav's (Dept of Sociology) 'Ignorance'
A few days ago, the Student Union network
posted a video clip a lecture you gave as part of the Introduction
to Sociology course, an obligatory course in the Sociology and
Anthropology department. In the course of the lecture, the footage
shows, you relieved yourself of the following drivel:
"When this whole story with this stupid
organisation called Im Tirtzu was taking place, which attacked the
fact, the stupid fascist, which attacked the fact, by the way
sponsored with American evangelist Christian radical money, which is
ready to support this as part of its war against the Arabs in
Israel, a complicated story, they claimed, that in the political
science departments, they did a report in the political science
departments, and claimed that most of the faculty there is
left-wing. This connects to your question. Most of the faculty isn't
left-wing, it's liberal in its way of thinking. Because social
sciences are inherently liberal. So to say that most of the staff is
left-wing, liberal, is nonsense, because the repertoire on which you
draw is liberal. Otherwise you'll shut these departments down.
Because the term "left-wing" is very problematic in that context,
because what exactly is left wing? I think, and this is to confuse
you a little more, that someone supporting two state for two peoples
is a right-winger. Left winger? I'm opposed to two states for two
peoples. So I'm left-wing?"
We preserved the garbled style of the
original.
Comments of such nature, made before an
audience of students on an obligatory course, betray shameful
ignorance on your part. As a "great liberal" you clearly violated
instruction 1109/11 (21.12.2010) of the Higher Education Council,
which clearly state that "any attempt at politicisation of the
academia should be rejected." In this decision, the Higher Education
Council ruled that the lectures should strive to expose the students
"to as varied a survey as possible of the areas which they teach."
Which, of course, failed to take place. In this last lecture you
unilaterally abused your standing, expressing one-sided political
opinions while barefacedly ignoring the Higher Education Council's
decision.
You claimed that Im Tirtzu attacked the
face that faculty members in political science are left-wing, or,
according to your interpretation, liberals. This is blatant
misrepresentation of our reports, and, graver still, the concept of
liberalism. The report we released on the developments in the
political science didn't assault the "left-wing" political opinions
of faculty members, but displayed the lack of variety in the content
materials, along with the exclusion, elimination and silencing of
researchers and research approaches that are not anti-Zionist or
anti-national.
http://972mag.com/professor-abused-for-criticising-im-tirtzu/32918/
10 January 2012
Dear Professor Shenhav,
Re: Your
contemptible statements against "Im Tirtzu"
A few days ago, the Student Union network
posted a video clip a lecture you gave as part of the Introduction
to Sociology course, an obligatory course in the Sociology and
Anthropology department. In the course of the lecture, the footage
shows, you relieved yourself of the following drivel:
"When this whole story with this stupid
organisation called Im Tirtzu was taking place, which attacked the
fact, the stupid fascist, which attacked the fact, by the way
sponsored with American evangelist Christian radical money, which is
ready to support this as part of its war against the Arabs in
Israel, a complicated story, they claimed, that in the political
science departments, they did a report in the political science
departments, and claimed that most of the faculty there is
left-wing. This connects to your question. Most of the faculty isn't
left-wing, it's liberal in its way of thinking. Because social
sciences are inherently liberal. So to say that most of the staff is
left-wing, liberal, is nonsense, because the repertoire on which you
draw is liberal. Otherwise you'll shut these departments down.
Because the term "left-wing" is very problematic in that context,
because what exactly is left wing? I think, and this is to confuse
you a little more, that someone supporting two state for two peoples
is a right-winger. Left winger? I'm opposed to two states for two
peoples. So I'm left-wing?"
We preserved the garbled style of the
original.
Comments of such nature, made before an
audience of students on an obligatory course, betray shameful
ignorance on your part. As a "great liberal" you clearly violated
instruction 1109/11 (21.12.2010) of the Higher Education Council,
which clearly state that "any attempt at politicisation of the
academia should be rejected." In this decision, the Higher Education
Council ruled that the lectures should strive to expose the students
"to as varied a survey as possible of the areas which they teach."
Which, of course, failed to take place. In this last lecture you
unilaterally abused your standing, expressing one-sided political
opinions while barefacedly ignoring the Higher Education Council's
decision.
You claimed that Im Tirtzu attacked the
face that faculty members in political science are left-wing, or,
according to your interpretation, liberals. This is blatant
misrepresentation of our reports, and, graver still, the concept of
liberalism. The report we released on the developments in the
political science didn't assault the "left-wing" political opinions
of faculty members, but displayed the lack of variety in the content
materials, along with the exclusion, elimination and silencing of
researchers and research approaches that are not anti-Zionist or
anti-national. You can read it on your own in the following
hyperlink.
http://www.imti.org.il/Reports/AcademicSpeechGag.pdf
Another report commented specifically on
the make-up of the faculty of the Politics and Government department
at Ben Gurion university, noting that 8 out of the 11 lecturers at
the time, and today 8 out of 9, are signatories of anti-Israeli
petitions or have expressed radical left-wing position, such as
supporting conscientious objection, accusing Israel of ethnic
cleansing, or supporting Tali Fahima and Azmi Bishara. You can read
this in the following hyperlink.
http://www.imti.org.il/Docs/P175/?ThisPageID=995
In other words, your interpretation of the
term "liberal" is a person supporting conscientious objection to
service in the IDF or accusing Israel of carrying out ethnic
cleansing. To your mind, someone who doesn't support conscientious
objection or the dissemination of anti-Semitic blood libel, is not a
liberal. This is probably the most pathetic and miserable definition
of liberalism. It is regrettable to see a lecturer of your standing,
chosen by a distinguished university to teach as course as important
as "Introduction to Sociology", displaying such profound ignorance
on the issues he comments on.
It would appear you have forgotten there
are important academic and ideological movements that see no
contradiction whatsoever between nationalism and liberalism. There
are approaches and social sciences that have complete faith in
individual rights and liberalism and simultaneously oppose the
pseudo-liberal model, the automatic support of which for dark
regimes and the assault on the values of the Western world has in
fact turned it into completely anti-liberal.
It seems the fact that the Higher
Education Council unanimously endorsed the conclusions of the
international committee that looked into the academic level and the
claims about political bias in the political science department, and
which completely vindicated the reports we publish, fails to impress
you.
In the future we recommend you think, if
even a little, before commenting in a manner that shames you
yourself first and foremost. Silence befits the wise men, and even
more so it befits the fools.
A complaint regarding your despicable
behaviour has been filed with the Higher Education Council.
Kind regards,
Ronen Shoval, Chairman, "Im Tirtzu"
Erez Tadmor, head of the hasbara and policy department.
CC:
Members of the Higher Education Council
Prof. Aharon Shai, Rector, Tel Aviv University
Prof. Yoav Ariel, Student Dean, Tel Aviv University
Mr. Amit Barak, Spokesman, Im Tirtzu
Mr. Matan Peleg, Head of Human Resources, Im Tirtzu
Mr. Uri Reshtick, Chair, Tel Aviv University Student Union
|