|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Israelis at
Non-Israeli Universities
UCLA - Gabriel Piterberg (Dept. of
History) draws a false analogy; Attempts to divert attention way
from the missiles falling on Israeli heartland
Gabriel Piterberg
Israel’s onslaught on Gaza may well do permanent damage to one of
the most effective tools in its propaganda kit: the image of the
morally handsome, ‘shooting and crying’ Israeli soldier.
Three weeks after the 1967 War, Avraham Shapira and Amos Oz, then
a rising young author, were summoned to Labour Party headquarters.
They were asked to make the demobilised soldiers from the kibbutzim
break the wall of silence and discuss their war experience.
Soldiers’ Talk (Siah Lohamim), the collection of
interviews they edited, was a national and international success.
The book, which forged the image of the handsome, dilemma-ridden,
existentially soul-searching Israeli soldier, was a hymn to that
frightening oxymoron, ‘purity of arms’ and the ideal of an exalted
Jewish morality.
It was also a kind of ‘central casting’ from which Oz drew many
of his fictional protagonists. Rabin (when he was ambassador to
Washington) and Elie Wiesel read extracts in the US ‘in order to
present the Israeli soldier’s profile’; and Golda Meir called it ‘a
sacred book’: ‘we are fortunate to have been blessed with such
sons.’ The latest version of Soldiers' Talk, in terms of
register and success, is Ari Folman’s Waltz with Bashir.
Given the might of Israel’s warriors and the vulnerability of
their targets, now that the country no longer engages in wars
against other state armies, the image is hard to keep alive. At the
same time it no longer matters in the way it once did: for political
and military elites in Israel, and the War on Terror constituency in
the US, the killing of Arabs and Muslims no longer requires any
weeping or soul-searching. It’s just what freedom-loving people do.
The war adulation of the recent pro-Israel demonstrations in Los
Angeles is chastening but you couldn’t call it hypocritical.
Perhaps with the benefit of hindsight, the attack on Gaza will be
seen as the action of a colonial power that is running out of ideas;
not unlike France in the final stage of the Algerian war.
Gabriel Piterberg
teaches history at UCLA. The
Returns of Zionism was published last year.
|